LTHEchat 351: Leadership and Academic Flourishing

Join us on Bluesky for #LTHEchat on Wednesday 28th January at 8pm GMT with guest Prof Damien Page to discuss Leadership and Academic Flourishing.

University leaders juggle a lot. Financial sustainability. Strategy. Governance. Regulators. Government. Partnerships. Reputation. Committees upon committees. It’s no surprise leadership can feel like permanent firefighting.

But if there’s one role that should trump all others, it’s this: creating the conditions in which people can flourish. Everything else flows from that. And yet, in a sector under huge pressure –  tighter regulation, shrinking resources, constant “transformation” that usually means cuts – this core purpose is often the first thing to slip.

Ironically, it’s precisely in difficult times that leaders should double down on it.

What does “flourishing” actually mean?

Ask a room of academics what they need to thrive and you’ll get a hundred different answers. That’s not a problem, that’s the business. Academic work is deeply personal. Discipline matters. Career stage matters. Institutional context matters.

But some themes keep coming up: autonomy, time, trust, space to think, freedom to explore and challenge, and leadership that supports rather than constrains. Real wellbeing isn’t lunchtime yoga (pleasant though that may be). It’s manageable workloads, clear priorities, and leaders who remove obstacles rather than add them.

Flourishing isn’t abstract or fluffy. It’s intensely practical. And leadership is the difference between it happening or not.

Leadership has to be close to reality

If leaders want academics to flourish, they need to understand what university life actually looks like now – not how it felt when they last taught regularly, and not the sanitised version that makes its way up through layers of management.

The more senior you become, the more reality gets filtered. Bad news is softened. Problems are minimised. A “good news culture” creeps in. And reality never reaches the top on its own.

There’s a lot of advice in higher education about leaders needing to be ‘less operational and more strategic’. Strategy matters, of course. But separating the strategic from the operational is one of the biggest mistakes universities make. Adaptive leadership depends on moving constantly between the two , understanding how the organisation actually works and letting that shape strategy.

Why so much university strategy fails

Most university strategies look impressive. Slick design. Inspiring verbs. Five or ten year horizons. Pillars, themes, golden threads. They arrive with a sense of destiny.

And then… very little changes.

For most staff, strategy only becomes visible at appraisal time, when they’re asked how their work aligns with it. That’s a problem.

As Richard Rumelt explains, bad strategy is usually full of buzzwords, avoids naming real problems, confuses goals with plans, and sets vague objectives detached from reality. Universities are particularly prone to all of these.

Good strategy starts with honesty: heavy workloads, rising expectations from students, tighter regulation, changing job markets, and finite resources. It then sets a clear approach to tackling those problems and backs it up with coordinated, realistic action. Without that grounding, strategy becomes theatre.

Get closer, not higher

This is why leaders need to become proximal. Town halls and all-staff meetings rarely surface the real issues – speaking up in those spaces often feels risky. To understand what’s really going on, leaders need to meet people where the work happens, without layers of management present.

But proximity only works if people feel safe to speak honestly. Psychological safety matters here. Not performative listening, but listening that leads to change.

Flourishing lives in the operational details

Flourishing isn’t enabled by vision statements. It lives in budgets, workload models, systems, and calendars.

Financial stability matters because money buys time and space. If people are constantly asked to do more with less, flourishing is impossible. Workload models aren’t boring admin, they’re strategic choices about what a university values.

And then there’s the other activity: endless meetings, sprawling committees, bloated processes, and clunky systems. Much of this adds little to teaching, research, or people’s development. Leaders should be ruthless minimalists here. Fewer meetings. Fewer forms. Fewer systems. Less noise.

Culture is felt, not declared

Culture isn’t a statement on a website. It’s what people feel every day. Trust. Transparency. Freedom. Authenticity.

Leaders shape that culture by how they behave: explaining decisions openly, trusting people to do good work, admitting what they don’t know, modelling healthy boundaries, and treating failure as learning rather than punishment. Being human matters.

Strip away what blocks purpose

Academics don’t need leaders to invent purpose, it’s already there. What they need is leadership that removes the barriers that suffocate it: bad strategy, needless bureaucracy, punitive cultures, and constant distraction.

University leadership is hard, emotional, and often uncomfortable work. But creating the conditions for people to flourish isn’t a nice to have. It’s the job.

Q1. Leaders should create the conditions in which academics may flourish. What does flourishing in the workplace look like / mean to you?

Q2. Should creating conditions for people to flourish be the utmost priority in the HE sector at a time of competing pressures?

Q3. What enables staff to feel as though their development, wellbeing and contributions are valued?

Q4. The TV series ‘Undercover Boss’ features CEOs in disguise investigating how their organisation really works. What might an undercover senior leader find in an HEI?

Q5. If ‘flourishing lives in the operational details,’ what one thing would streamline HE workloads?

Q6. What would help us to ‘feel’ a university culture?

Speaker Bio

Damien Page is Vice Chancellor at Buckinghamshire New University. First in his family to attend university, following a spell in advertising, he began his educational career in FE teaching English then moved to HE in posts at Greenwich, Leeds Beckett and Wolverhampton before joining BNU.

Posted in announcement | Leave a comment

LTHEchat 350: Teaching, Learning, Assessment and GenAI: Moving from Reaction to Intentional Practice

Generative AI has become part of higher education with remarkable speed.

In a short period of time, it has entered classrooms, assessment design, academic writing, feedback processes, and professional workflows. For many educators, its arrival felt sudden and difficult to make sense of, leaving little space to pause and consider what this shift means for learning, teaching, and academic practice.

Initial responses across the sector have often focused on risk, regulation, and control. These concerns are understandable. Yet they only tell part of the story. Alongside uncertainty and anxiety, there is also curiosity, experimentation, and a growing recognition that GenAI raises questions that are fundamentally pedagogical rather than purely technical.

On 21 January, we are delighted to host #LTHEchat to explore these questions together and to move the conversation from reaction towards more intentional, reflective practice.

The discussion will be grounded in the Manifesto for Generative AI in Higher Education, and informed by the wider work of GenAI:N3, a national initiative in Ireland supporting collaborative engagement with generative AI across higher education.

GenAI:N3: A Collaborative Project for the Sector

GenAI:N3 is a national network that was established in Ireland as part of the N-TUTORR programme, to support technological higher education institutions as they responded to the rapid emergence of generative AI. Rather than focusing on tools or technical solutions, the project centres on people, practice, and shared learning.

At its core, GenAI:N3 aims to build institutional and sectoral capacity by creating spaces where educators, professional staff, and leaders can explore GenAI together. Its work is grounded in collaboration across institutions and disciplines, recognising that no single university or role has all the answers.

The project focuses on several interconnected areas:

  • Supporting communities of practice where staff can share experiences, challenges, and emerging approaches
  • Encouraging critical and reflective engagement with GenAI in teaching, learning, assessment, and professional practice
  • Exploring the ethical, social, and institutional implications of GenAI, including questions of power, inclusion, sustainability, and academic judgement
  • Developing shared resources, events, and conversations that help the sector learn collectively rather than in isolation

GenAI:N3 is not about accelerating adoption for its own sake. It is about helping institutions and individuals make informed, values-led decisions that are aligned with the purposes of higher education.

The Manifesto as a Shared Thinking Space

The Manifesto for Generative AI in Higher Education emerged from this collaborative context. It did not begin as a formal deliverable or a policy exercise. Instead, it took shape gradually through workshops, conversations, reflections, and recurring questions raised by staff and students across the sector.

What became clear was a need for a shared language. Not a framework that closed down debate, but a set of statements that could hold complexity, uncertainty, and difference.

The Manifesto brings together 30 short statements organised across three themes:

  • Rethinking teaching and learning
  • Responsibility, ethics, and power
  • Imagination, humanity, and the future

It is intentionally concise and deliberately open. It does not offer instructions or compliance rules. Instead, it invites educators and institutions to pause, reflect, and ask what kind of learning we are designing for in a world where generative tools are readily available.

One of its central ideas is that GenAI does not replace thinking. Rather, it reveals the cost of not thinking. In doing so, it challenges us to look beyond surface solutions and to engage more deeply with questions of purpose, judgement, and educational values.

Why These Conversations Matter Now

Much of the early discourse around GenAI has centred on assessment integrity and detection. While these issues matter, they risk narrowing the conversation too quickly.

GenAI does not operate uniformly across disciplines, contexts, or learning designs. What is productive in one setting may be inappropriate in another. Students experience this inconsistency acutely, particularly when institutional policies feel disconnected from everyday teaching practice.

The work of GenAI:N3, and the thinking captured in the Manifesto, keeps this complexity in view. It foregrounds ideas such as transparency as a foundation for trust, academic judgement as something that can be supported but not automated, and ethical leadership as an institutional responsibility rather than an individual burden.

These ideas play out in very practical ways, in curriculum design, in assessment briefs, in conversations with students, and in decisions about which tools are used and why.

Why #LTHEchat?

#LTHEchat has long been a space for thoughtful, practice-led discussion across higher education. That makes it an ideal forum to explore generative AI not simply as a technology, but as a catalyst for deeper pedagogical and institutional reflection.

This chat is not about promoting a single position or reaching neat conclusions. Instead, it is an opportunity to surface experiences, tensions, and emerging practices from across the sector.

The questions we will pose are designed to open up dialogue around issues such as abundance, transparency, disciplinary difference, and what it means to keep learning human in a GenAI-rich environment.

An Invitation to Join the Conversation

Whether you are actively experimenting with generative AI, approaching it with caution, or still forming your views, your perspective is welcome.

Bring examples from your own context. Bring uncertainties and unfinished thinking. The Manifesto itself is open to use, adapt, and challenge, and GenAI:N3 continues to evolve through the contributions of those engaging with its work.

As the Manifesto suggests, the future classroom is a conversation. On 21 January, we hope you will join that conversation with us through #LTHEchat.

Links

GenAI:N3 https://genain3.ie

Manifesto for Generative AI in Higher Education https://genain3.ie/files/manifesto/

Questions and Chat

Q1 – We talk a lot about GenAI as a “disruption”. What actually feels disrupted in your teaching or learning practice, and what hasn’t changed at all?

Q2 – The Manifesto for Generative AI in Higher Education argues that we teach in an age of abundance, not scarcity. What does that idea challenge most in current higher-education practice?

Q3 – Many institutions have focused on detection and restriction. What would it look like to design learning and assessment assuming GenAI is present?

Q4 – Transparency is described in the Manifesto as “the new integrity”. How comfortable are we “really” with being open about how GenAI is used by staff and students?

Q5 – GenAI does not “live” the same way in every discipline. Where do you see productive disciplinary differences emerging, and where are blanket policies getting in the way?

Q6 – Looking ahead: what is one small but meaningful change you could make in the next semester that keeps learning human in a GenAI-rich world?

Guests Bios

Dr Hazel Farrell (PhD, SFEA, MA)
South East Technological University (SETU)

Hazel Farrell has been immersed in the AI narrative since 2023 both through practice-based research and the development of guidelines, frameworks, tools, and training to support educators and learners throughout the HE sector. She led the national N-TUTORR GenAI:N3 project which was included in the EDUCAUSE 2025 Horizon Report as an exemplar of good practice. She is the SETU Academic Lead for GenAI and Chair of the university’s GenAI Steering Committee. The practical application of GenAI provides a strong foundation for her research, with student engagement initiatives for creative disciplines at the forefront of her work. Hazel recently won DEC24 Digital Educator Award for her GenAI contributions to the HE sector. She has presented extensively on a variety of GenAI related topics and has several publications in this space.

Ken McCarthy (MSc, PgDip)
South East Technological University (SETU)

Ken McCarthy is the Head of the Centre for Academic Practice at SETU, Ken leads strategic initiatives to enhance teaching, learning, and assessment across the university. He works with academic staff, professional teams, and students to promote inclusive, research-informed, and digitally enriched education.  He is the current vice-president of ILTA (Irish Learning Technology Association) and was previously the university lead for the N-TUTORR programme.  He has a lifelong interest in technology and education and combines this in his professional role.  He has written and presented on technology enhanced learning in general and in GenAI in particular over the past number of years.

Posted in announcement | Leave a comment

LTHEchat 349: Redundancy, Resilience, and Finding What’s Next

There’s no nice way to talk about redundancy.

It doesn’t arrive as a single moment, even when there is a single date attached to it. It arrives in phases: uncertainty, waiting, the conversation itself, the aftermath. For some, it’s sudden. For others, it’s drawn out and quietly exhausting. Either way, it has a way of cutting through confidence, identity, and momentum, particularly in a sector many of us entered because we believed in it. Many of us still believe in it, despite the current state of the sector and our shared experiences of trying to navigate constant change. 

A gentle note: this post talks openly about redundancy, job loss, and their emotional impact. Writing about these experiences has been challenging for me at times, and reading about them may bring things up for you too. Please take care of yourself as you read, and feel free to step away or re-engage in whatever way feels right.

What often goes unspoken is the emotional impact that redundancy and job loss has: the need to stay composed, professional, and outwardly “okay” at precisely the moment when certainty and the feeling of confidence and wellbeing collapses. Many people describe a quiet sense of shame, even when they know intellectually that redundancy is structural, not personal. Confidence takes a hit long before a job title disappears, and recovery is rarely linear. The worst thing to be told by HR during the process is “It’s not personal.” When, in reality, that’s exactly what it is and what it feels like.

It’s also important to acknowledge voluntary severance and voluntary redundancy, which many colleagues across higher education have had to consider in recent years. Faced with ongoing cuts, restructures, and repeated rounds of change, some people make the difficult decision to step forward voluntarily; not because they want to leave, but because they are trying to manage risk, protect their wellbeing, or create a degree of certainty in an otherwise unstable situation. These choices are rarely straightforward. They are often made with full awareness that further redundancies may follow, and that staying might simply delay the inevitable. Voluntary routes don’t remove the emotional impact; they shift it earlier.

For some, choosing voluntary severance is a way of regaining a small amount of control; a chance to plan, to leave with dignity, or to reduce the prolonged anxiety of waiting. For others, it brings its own form of grief: leaving work they care about, colleagues they value, and identities they’ve spent years building. None of this is easy or something many of us ever prepare for. But perhaps, with higher education in the current state it’s in, we should. If nothing else, being aware of it might help in the long run. 

There’s also a financial reality that rarely gets talked about openly. Finding a new role can take time, often longer than expected, particularly in a sector that is being affected by a tough economic climate like higher education. Based on lived experience, it is not unrealistic for a job search to take six months or more, even for experienced professionals. Where it’s possible, having the equivalent of six months’ salary saved can make the difference between being able to think clearly and being forced into rushed decisions under pressure. Many people don’t have that buffer, especially after previous redundancies, which only goes to amplify stress and anxiety. This isn’t about blame or planning failure; it’s about acknowledging the real conditions people are navigating.

This week’s #LTHEchat is for you if you’ve experienced redundancy, are currently navigating your way through it, have experienced being under threat of redundancy, or are quietly wondering how you’d cope if it came your way.

It’s worth saying explicitly that this conversation sits in a UK higher education context. The structures, protections, and expectations around redundancy vary internationally, but in the UK, it has become an increasingly familiar feature of academic, professional services, and learning technology careers. For many, redundancy is no longer a once-in-a-career disruption, but something encountered multiple times across roles, contracts, and institutions. I know it has been for me (more on this later).

Under UK employment law, redundancy comes with a statutory minimum level of protection, based on length of service and age, and only after a qualifying period of employment. While this provides a baseline of financial support, it is often just that: a minimum. It rarely reflects the real impact of job loss on household finances, mental wellbeing, or longer-term career security, particularly when redundancy happens more than once or later in life.

I won’t go into the specifics of the law, but you can and should read up on it here: https://www.gov.uk/redundancy-your-rights

“You’ll normally be entitled to statutory redundancy pay if you’re an employee and you’ve been working for your current employer for 2 years or more.”

The important bit here is that, if you’ve been in the same role/contract for less than 2 years, you are entitled to nothing beyond your normal contract conditions and notice period.

I cannot stress this enough but, if you are under notice or a restructure, redundancy, or feel in any way that this might happen to you, then you really do need to know your rights!

This chat is about three things:

First: if this is happening to you, this space is for you.

You don’t need to project optimism. You don’t need to have a success story ready. You don’t even need to be actively job hunting yet. Redundancy has a way of isolating people just when connection matters most. This chat is about saying: you’re not alone, and this experience is more common than we often admit in HE.

Second: sharing ways to stay sane and keep going.

Job hunting is not just a practical exercise, it’s an emotional one. It requires optimism to be available on-demand, self-promotion under strain, and repeated exposure to rejection or silence, often while trying to hold together family life, finances, and a sense of self-worth. Updating a CV while processing loss, uncertainty, or anger takes a toll. We’ll talk about routines, boundaries, mindset shifts, and small habits that help maintain momentum without burning out. Not productivity hacks, but survival strategies.

Third: finding your next role, without losing yourself.

Redundancy often forces reflection: What do I actually want? What am I good at that I’ve been underselling? What could I do differently next time? We’ll share practical advice on CVs, applications, networking, and interviews, but also talk about how to make choices that feel aligned, not just reactive.

Why this conversation matters now

Higher education is changing rapidly. Funding pressures, restructures, and fixed-term roles are now part of many career paths, particularly in learning technology, digital education, and professional services. Redundancy is no longer an exception, it’s becoming a structural feature of the sector.

Yet we still talk about it in hushed tones, as if it signals failure rather than context.

This chat is an invitation to be honest about that reality, to learn from one another, and to remind ourselves that careers are rarely linear, even when LinkedIn profiles make them look that way.

Living through redundancy, or the sustained threat of it, doesn’t happen in isolation. It spills into family life, relationships, sleep, health, and self-belief. Partners carry worry. Children notice tension. Friends don’t always know what to say. Even when nothing has “officially” happened yet, the emotional load is real. Wellbeing isn’t a side issue here; it’s central. For many people, the hardest part isn’t the job search itself but trying to stay present and grounded while life continues around them.

 The personal bit – my experience(s)

I’ve experienced redundancy multiple times (five, at the last count) over the course of my career – three in the last seven years and within higher education and digital learning organisations. I won’t list them out here (you can see them on my LinkedIn profile), but they span different organisations, different roles, and very different stages of my life.

What matters more than the specifics is the pattern.

Each experience landed differently, not because the circumstances were wildly different, but because I was. Earlier on, redundancy felt like disruption and shock. Later, it carried heavier emotional and financial consequences, affecting not just me, but my family and the sense of stability we were trying to maintain. The longer you work in the sector, the more you build – responsibilities, commitments, expectations – and the harder that uncertainty hits.

Over time, redundancy doesn’t just interrupt work; it reshapes how you relate to it. You become more cautious. More alert to signals of change. Less willing to assume that stability will follow effort. That shift isn’t cynicism. It’s self-protection.

What has stayed with me most is the cumulative emotional impact. Each redundancy leaves a residue: heightened anxiety, reduced trust, quicker fear responses when organisations talk about “change” or “realignment”. It’s not something you “get over” neatly. It’s something you learn to carry; sometimes well, sometimes not.

I share this not to dwell on the past, or to offer myself as an example, but to be clear about why this conversation matters to me. I know what it feels like to be a competent, capable, committed, passionate and energetic lifelong learner, yet still be exposed to forces beyond your control. I also know how much harder it is to keep going when belief – in yourself, in the system, in the future – has taken a knock.

Lessons learned

What I’ve learned isn’t that redundancy gets easier with experience. In many ways, it’s the opposite.

Each time it happens, the impact accumulates. The emotional weight is heavier. The financial risk is greater. The effect on wellbeing and belief is harder to absorb. Earlier in a career, redundancy can feel like a shock or a disruption; later on, it can feel like something more existential; a challenge to stability, confidence, and the assumption that good work will eventually lead to security.

What changes isn’t resilience so much as context. Different stages of life bring different responsibilities, pressures, and limits on how much uncertainty you can carry. Experience doesn’t cushion the blow, it just means you recognise it more quickly.

I have written about my experiences before, please read if you’d like more insight into the lessons I’ve learned and how I’ve moved beyond the shock, distrust of leaders and the motivations, grieving, wellbeing, etc

Join the conversation

This chat isn’t about fixing redundancy, it’s about acknowledging its reality, sharing what helps, and reminding each other that none of this is faced alone. Whether you’re in the middle of it, on the other side of it, or supporting someone who is, your perspective is welcome.

  • Bring your questions.
  • Bring your hard-fought lessons.
  • Bring your uncertainty, if that’s where you are.

Most educators already aim for this, but the expectations and the stakes are rising.

Questions and Chat

Q1. Redundancy doesn’t always arrive suddenly. For some it’s imposed, for others it’s voluntary severance made under pressure or uncertainty. Where are you currently, or where have you been, on that journey?

Q2. In the early days of redundancy or deciding to take voluntary severance,
what felt hardest, emotionally or practically, and what helped you cope, even in small ways?

Q3. Wellbeing often takes a hit long before work officially ends.
What have you found helps you maintain some sense of balance or stability while living with uncertainty? #LTHEchat 

Q4. CVs, applications, and “selling yourself” can feel especially hard at this point.
What’s helped you tell your story honestly, without feeling you have to apologise, explain, or fake optimism?

Q5. When job searches stretch on, motivation can dip. What’s helped you keep going or what do you wish you’d known earlier about sustaining momentum?

Q6. For someone facing redundancy or weighing up voluntary severance right now:
what’s one thing you’d want them to hear from people who’ve been there?

Guest Bio

speaker portrait

David Hopkins is a digital learning leader with over 18 years’ experience working across UK higher education, online education, and EdTech organisations. His work has focused on designing and delivering large-scale online and hybrid learning, leading digital learning teams, and supporting institutions through periods of change, including platform implementations, new programme launches, and organisational restructures.

Across his career, David has worked in both established universities and early-stage education start-ups, giving him a practical understanding of how innovation, uncertainty, and risk play out in real roles and real lives. He has experienced redundancy multiple times and writes openly about its professional and personal impact. David is passionate about inclusive leadership, sustainable digital education, and supporting people through transition; whether that’s navigating redundancy, rethinking career direction, or building resilient learning environments.

Posted in announcement | 1 Comment

LTHEchat 348: Navigating the New OfS Quality Era and What It Means for Students, Staff, and the Sector

Join us on Bluesky for #LTHEchat on Wednesday 7th January at 8pm GMT with guests Puiyin Wong, Dr Katharine Hubbard, Dr Kevin Campbell-Karn, Professor David Webster and Paula Han to discuss Navigating the New OfS Quality Era: What It Means for Students, Staff and the Sector.

The Office for Students’ (OfS) latest proposal represents a significant shift in how teaching quality and student outcomes will be assessed. The message is clear: every higher education provider will be pulled into a single, integrated quality-assessment system that blends the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) with core regulatory conditions.

For the sector, it’s a moment of scrutiny, but also a chance to rethink how we support students.

What is changing in the new quality landscape?

Under the proposals, all providers will be assessed on a regular cycle and rated on two things: student experience and student outcomes. Both come with tougher baseline expectations and a ‘Lowest Rating’ rule meaning if a provider is Bronze in Student Outcomes but Gold in Student Experience, they can only be awarded Bronze overall. The OfS also wants to strengthen the role of the student voice, make wider use of the National Student Survey (NSS), and in the second round the Post-Graduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES). The OfS will now intervene more quickly when risks show up.

If a provider underperforms, the consequences could be serious: Restrictions on growth, funding or even degree awarding powers. And postgraduate taught programmes are no longer just a ‘health check – they are becoming a high-stakes regulatory metric comparable to the NSS.

In short: accountability will be universal, cyclical and very visible.
More details here: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/reforms-to-quality-regulation/the-future-of-quality-regulation-quick-guide-to-our-proposals/

But the evidence gap is real

Jim Dickinson put it bluntly in a WonkHE article You can’t fix OfS’ quality proposals without fixing the NSS: https://wonkhe.com/wonk-corner/you-cant-fix-ofs-quality-proposals-without-fixing-the-nss/

He’s right. The NSS was never designed to measure staffing levels, resourcing, assessment validity or the quality of academic support. Yet those now sit at the core of regulatory decision making. Without a stronger, more rounded evidence base, institutions risk being judged on data that simply doesn’t capture what quality really looks like.

So yes, we need better measurement, but we also need to strengthen our own internal systems for understanding what’s happening in our classrooms, workshops, labs and learning spaces.

What educators can do now: designing high quality learning under B1 & B2

Conditions B1 and B2 already lay out what “good” looks like in terms of academic experience and the support/resources students need to succeed. In practical terms, that means designing learning that:

  • is current, coherent and challenging, rather than a collection of disconnected modules
  • actively engages students through discussion, hands-on tasks, labs, digital tools, and not just long lectures
  • is supported by realistic, accessible resources
  • builds in formative feedback and genuine academic support
  • is inclusive by design, reflecting the diversity of students’ backgrounds and circumstances
  • involves students meaningfully, not just at the end of the module, but throughout the learning process

Most educators already aim for this, but the expectations and the stakes are rising.

And here’s the uncomfortable truth…

All of this is happening in a sector where staff are exhausted. Academics, professional services colleagues, technicians, learning designers, librarians, wellbeing teams — everyone is stretched. People are being asked to do more whilst resources shrink.

The reality is that implementing these proposals properly will require more time, more people, and more investment. It also means recognising that colleagues across the university, not just academics, are experts in their own right and essential to delivering a high quality student experience.

And whilst improving quality is important (students are investing heavily in their education), there’s no point in pretending the OfS proposals will be easy to meet. For some institutions, they may feel less like a helpful framework and more like a stick to beat them with.

References

Office for Students. (2025, September 18). The future of quality regulation – quick guide to our proposals. https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/reforms-to-quality-regulation/the-future-of-quality-regulation-quick-guide-to-our-proposals/ (Office for Students)
Dickinson, J. (2025, December 5). You can’t fix OfS’ quality proposals without fixing the NSS. Wonkhe. https://wonkhe.com/wonk-corner/you-cant-fix-ofs-quality-proposals-without-fixing-the-nss/ (wonkhe.com)

Guest Bios

Puiyin Wong is Senior Advisor (Digital Pedagogy & Practice) at Buckinghamshire New University, where she leads the institution’s strategic development of digital education, as well as the Digital Education team. She is also Trustee of ALT and a PhD researcher at Lancaster University. Her research explores the interplay between pedagogies and technology for learning and professional development. With over 20 years experience in HE and a keen interest in bringing people together, she is connected to colleagues in the UK and internationally. Importantly, as a person from the Global Majority, she empathises with her peers from underrepresented groups. Puiyin leads a multi award winning researchers community – #TELresearchers & #HEresearchers that connects educational researchers at different career stages, from around the world.

Dr Katharine Hubbard is a National Teaching Fellow and Principal Fellow of Advance HE, and is currently Director of Learning Enhancement and Academic Practice (LEAP) at Buckinghamshire New University. Katharine is a leading expert in higher education, including equity within HE, awarding gaps, effective pedagogies within STEM subjects and career support for education focussed academics. She publishes impactful educational research and scholarship in international peer-reviewed journals (Katharine’s GoogleScholar profile). She is the author of a sector leading Inclusive Education Framework, funded by the Quality Assurance Agency and highlighted as excellent practice in reports by both QAA and AdvanceHE.

Dr. Kevin Campbell-Karn is the Head of Graduate Outcomes, dedicated to bridging the gap between academic study and professional success. With 23 years of HE experience and a background as a first-in-family graduate, Kevin understands that data only matters when it leads to real opportunity. His approach is grounded in proven success: he previously led placement provision in Sports Therapy that secured 100% NSS overall satisfaction for three consecutive years. Now, Kevin focuses on coaching and empowering staff through the shifting quality landscape. Rather than just enforcing policy, he works alongside academic teams to demystify complex OfS metrics and integrate career readiness into the curriculum. His goal is to support colleagues in designing meaningful interventions that improve student outcomes without increasing workload, proving that regulatory compliance and authentic student support go hand in hand.

Professor Dave Webster is a Senior Advisor in Pedagogy and Practice here at BNU. He has previously worked at the University of Liverpool, SOAS, and the University of Gloucestershire. His doctoral research was in Buddhist Philosophy, and he has written on a wide range of topics, including critical notions of spirituality, philosophy, blues music and sport. He has ongoing concerns with inclusive pedagogy, ethics & AI in Education, Buddhist philosophy and for much of his time he is interested in the phenomenology of learning and belief. He is a National Teaching Fellow, and a Senior Fellow of the HEA (Advance HE), and sees Quality Assurance predominantly through the lens of ensuring equity amongst learners.

Paula Han is a Senior Advisor in Pedagogy and Practice here at BNU is a driven education professional with 21 years’ experience across post‑compulsory, Further, and Higher Education. She has designed, delivered, and led curricula, and headed teacher‑training programmes that energise and empower practitioners. Paula’s expertise in teaching, learning, and assessment is grounded in current pedagogical research, and my enthusiasm for transformative practice consistently inspires the academics I train.
Paula has a strong track record of elevating academic practice through targeted CPD, one‑to‑one coaching, and strategic projects such as Supported Teacher Research initiatives. Her impact was recognised with the Student Union Award for Academic Staff Partner of the Year at BNU.
As the first in my family to attend university, Paula is committed to lifelong learning – she has a Masters in Education, Senior Fellowship, and has led research into unseen observations in Higher Education.

Learning Enhancement and Academic Practice (LEAP), Buckinghamshire New University
LEAP is BNU’s central academic development unit. In addition to our broader academic development programme, we are responsible for rapid improvements in teaching quality and regulatory compliance, focussing on areas with poorer student outcomes. We work collaboratively with senior leadership, programme teams and individuals to identify issues and develop practice.

Posted in announcement | 1 Comment

LTHEChat 347: Loneliness in Higher Education

Join us on Bluesky with guest Bianca Fox  (@bianca-f-o-x.bsky.social) on Wednesday, 10th December 2025 at 20:00 GMT

It is not uncommon at this time of the year to talk about loneliness. From an increased number of TV commercials encouraging us to remember those who are spending Christmas alone to numerous local events meant to bring people together, it feels like suddenly the entire world is refocusing on loneliness as if this were a feeling only associated with winter or Christmas. In addition, we are exposed to news headlines that often refer to loneliness as a new ‘pandemic’ (Potter, 2023), ‘illness’ (Alberti, 2018), ‘epidemic’ (Easton, 2018), ‘plague’ (Gil, 2014) or ‘disease’ (Perry, 2014).

My interest in the study of loneliness in young people started in 2016. With the launch of the BBC documentary The Age of Loneliness (2016) and the launch of Jo Cox’s Commission on Loneliness in January 2017, loneliness became acknowledged as a serious social problem in the UK. Loneliness affects so many people that a minister for loneliness was appointed on 17 January 2018, making the UK the first country in the world to recognise the social significance of loneliness. But why does it matter? Why do we hear more about loneliness these days? It may be because numerous studies have found that loneliness affects our sense of who we are (Oakley, 2020), our quality of life (Shiovitz-Ezra et al. 2009), life satisfaction (Fiori & Consedine 2013), or well-being (Chen & Feeley 2014). After the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organisation took a step further and declared loneliness as a ‘global public health concern’ (Johnson, 2023).

So, regardless of the time of the year when the media discourse becomes dominated by stories on loneliness, how is loneliness conceptualised and who is likely to experience it? Loneliness is described in the literature as a common feeling (Tan, Pamuk, Donder, 2013: 606) that all people experience at some point in their lives, more specifically, a displeasing, undesirable, negative feeling that results from the discrepancy between one’s real social relations and one’s desired social relationships (Perlman & Peplau, 1981). However, it is important to note that it is not the multiplicity of social relations that makes us feel socially contended, but the value and significance of these relations. This means that loneliness can occur both in the presence or absence of other people (Masi, Chen, Hawkley, & Cacioppo, 2011)and, if you’re like me, you have probably found yourself in rooms full of people and still felt lonely. That may be because loneliness is usually generated less by the number or diversity of social relations and more by the lack of satisfying, meaningful social relations (Young, 1982; Andersson, 1993) or by social relations that lack intimacy, honesty and emotiveness (Weiss, 1973).

As it is a basic fact of life, loneliness can be experienced by anyone, regardless of age (Heinrich & Gullone, 2006) and time of the year. Yet research conducted so far shows that when discussing loneliness, we immediately think about elderly people who are not in the line of work anymore and/or experience bereavement, usually ignoring young adults who also struggle with loneliness. According to Pinquart & Sorensen (2003), the prevalence and intensity of loneliness are in fact greater in young adults than in any other age group. Even more, Victor and Yang (2012) argue that the prevalence of loneliness is U-shaped when mapped graphically against age, indicating that younger and older people have the highest risk of experiencing loneliness.

Despite it being a common emotion that we all experience at some point in our lives, the social stigma attached to loneliness can make people reluctant to declare it, which leads to difficulties in identifying individuals who are struggling with loneliness and difficulties in finding innovative solutions for prevention and intervention. Feeling lonely is often perceived as a sign of weakness, which means that people feel ashamed to declare that they feel lonely. This is particularly relevant for those working in Higher Education who often don’t admit to feeling lonely. Although a certain alone time is required for those working in HE, feeling lonely can be very detrimental with potential implications on mental health, job satisfaction and career progression.

The past 20 years have seen an upsurge in studies on loneliness in Higher Education. However, these studies focus merely on students (e.g. Oakley, 2020; Ellard et al., 2023; Carwford et al., 2024), often ignoring any other young adults that are not in Higher Education and, equally important, professionals working in Higher Education (Jandrić, 2022).

For this LTHE chat I wanted to challenge this narrative and shift the focus to HE staff, as this group is frequently left out of mainstream research. Join us for an evening of reflection on the topic of loneliness in your role and potential strategies to support colleagues on academic or professional services contracts who are transitioning into HE and may be feeling lonely.

References

Alberti, F. B. (2018, November 1). Loneliness is a modern illness of the body, not just the mind. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/01/loneliness-illness-body-mind-epidemic.

Andersson, L. (1993). Loneliness. In: R. Kastenbaum (Ed.), The encyclopedia of adult development. Phoenix: The Oryx Press, pp. 282-285

Chen, Y., Feeley, T.H. (2014). Social Support, Social Strain, Loneliness, and Well-being Among Older Adults: An analysis of the Health and Retirement Study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 31 (2): 141–161.

Crawford, J., Kelly-Ann Allen, K-A., BiaPani & Michael Cowling

(2024) When artificial intelligence substitutes humans in higher education: the cost of

loneliness, student success, and retention, Studies in Higher Education, 49:5, 883-897, DOI:10.1080/03075079.2024.2326956

Easton, M. (2018, February 11). How should we tackle the loneliness epidemic? BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42887932.

Ellard, O.B., Dennison, C., Tuomainen, H. (2023). Interventions addressing loneliness amongst university students: a systematic review. Child and adolescent Mental Health 28. 4 : 512-523.

Fiori, K.L., Consedine, N.S. (2013). Positive and Negative Social Exchanges and Mental Health Across the Transition to College: Loneliness as a Mediator. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30 (7): 920–941.

Gil, N. (2014, July 20). Loneliness: A silent plague that is hurting young people most. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/jul/20/loneliness-britains-silent-plague-hurts-young-people-most.

Heinrich, L. M., Gullone, E. (2006). The Clinical Significance of Lone-

liness: A Literature Review. Clinical Psychology Review 26 (6): 695–718.

Jandrić, P. (2022). Alone-Time and Loneliness in the Academia. Postdigital Science and Education 4: 633- 642. Available at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42438-022-00294-4.pdf

Johnson, S. (2023). WHO declrares loneliness a ‘global public health concern’. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2023/nov/16/who-declares-loneliness-a-global-public-health-concern

Masi, C. Cacioppo, J., Hawkley, L., Chen, H. (2010). A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 17, 2010, doi: 10.1177/1088868310377394

Oakley, L. (2020). Exploring Student Loneliness in Higher Education: A Discursive Psychology Approach. Palgrave Macmillan. Available at https://docdrop.org/static/drop-pdf/Lee-Oakley—Exploring-Student-Loneliness-in-Higher-Education_-A-Discursive-Psychology-Approach-Springer-International-Publishing_Palgrave-Macmillan-2020–0Bs7n.pdf

Perry, P. (2014, February 17). Loneliness is killing us—We must start treating this disease. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/17/loneliness-report-bigger-killer-obesity-lonely-people.

Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In S.Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.). Personal relationships (Vol. 3, pp. 31–56). New York:Academic Press.

Pinquart, M., Sorensen, S. (2010). Influences on Loneliness in Older

Adults: A Meta-Analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 23 (4): 245–266.

Potter, L. (2023). Is loneliness the new pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Loneliness%20blog%20Libby%20Potter_0.pdf

Shiovitz-Ezra, S., Leitsch, S., Graber, J., Karraker, A. (2009).

Quality of Life and Psychological Health Indicators in the National Social Life,

Health, and Aging Project. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 64B (Suppl. 1):

i30–i37.

TAN, Ç., PAMUK, M. DÖNDER, A. (2013). Loneliness and Mobile Phone. Procedia-Social and behavioural Sciences 103, 606-611, available online at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813038238

Young, J.E. (1982). Loneliness, depression and cognitive therapy: Theory and application. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman, Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp:379-406). New York: Wiley.

Victor, C. R., Yang, K. (2012). The Prevalence of Loneliness Among

Adults: A Case Study of the United Kingdom. The Journal of Psychology 146

(1–2): 85–104.

Weiss, R.S. (1973), Loneliness: The Experience of Emotion and Social Isolation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Guest Biography

Bianca is a Principal Fellow of Advance HE and a Senior Lecturer in Academic Practice at Nottingham Trent University. Bianca works with new members of staff, supporting them to develop their teaching practice and achieve Fellowship of Advance HE (HEA). Bianca holds a PhD in Media and Communication Studies and has more than 15 years of teaching experience in Higher Education, in the UK and other European countries. She is passionate about developing CPD programmes and, as a course design expert, she was the academic lead of the ERASMUS+ MeLDE project, contributing to the design of a CPD programme in digital literacy for European educators. 

Questions and chat

Q1 –  How would you define loneliness at work/in your role?

Q2 –  At what stage of your career in Higher Education did you feel most lonely and why?

Q3 – Who or what helped when you felt lonely in your role?

Q4 – Loneliness is often associated with the transition to HE. What support is already available in your institution for staff transitioning into HE?

Q5 – How successful is this support? How is the success of these support strategies monitored?

Q6 – How can we best support Early career academics or practitioners transitioning into HE?

Posted in announcement | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

LTHEChat 346: Staying Active as a Researcher After Graduation: Teachers as Knowledge-Builders

Join us on Bluesky with guest Aimie Brennan (@aimiebrennan.bsky.social) on Wednesday, 3rd December 2025 at 20:00 GMT

For many educators, research is something we associate with initial teacher education, postgraduate study, or the occasional school-based project that stems from specific policy/reporting requirements. But research shouldn’t end at graduation. In fact, staying curious, reflective, and research-engaged can become one of the most sustaining aspects of a long and fulfilling teaching career.

The education landscape increasingly recognises the teacher as researcher, reflective practitioner, and evidence-based practitioner. In Ireland, Frameworks such as the Teaching Council’s CosánCéimCode of Professional Conduct, and the emphasis on reflective practice within Droichead all highlight that inquiry is not an optional extra, it is central to professional growth. It is the responsibility of everyone within the wider education system to ensure that teachers are supported to embrace both a teacher and researcher identity post-graduation. 

For many teachers, there’s a real question: How do you stay active as a researcher while balancing the genuine pressures of classroom life? The reality is that research doesn’t have to be a formal pursuit or a published article; it can be:

  • testing a new approach to feedback
  • gathering student voice
  • reading a recent study
  • collaborating with colleagues to solve a problem
  • Working with assessment, attendance or other learner data 
  • Using evidence to inform school improvement plans 

These are all forms of teacher-research.

Why Research Still Matters After Graduation

1. Research keeps practice adaptive

Irish classrooms are continually evolving with new curricula, increasingly diverse learners, evolving digital tools, and shifting societal expectations. Engaging in research, even in small ways, helps teachers stay responsive rather than reactive to change. Instead of simply applying best practices, research-active teachers examine what works (or doesn’t) in their own classrooms. This can lead to more thoughtful decisions about pedagogy, assessment, inclusion, and equity.

2. Research strengthens professional agency

When teachers engage in evidence-informed inquiry, they position themselves not only as implementers of policy but as shapers of educational practice. Seeing research as a powerful mechanism for giving teachers freedom, autonomy and agency can fuels confidence and creativity in the classroom. Research can empower teachers to be ‘agents of knowing’, not just passive recipients (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1999). 

3. Research builds community and conversation

Irish schools increasingly adopt collaborative models such as School Self-Evaluation (SSE) and subject department inquiry. Research opens meaningful professional dialogue, moving beyond a “what works for me” question to a “what works, for whom, and in which context?” approach. In this way research has a broader impact on the whole school community and beyond. 

4. Research bridges theory and the realities of Irish classrooms

Importantly, practitioners bring something academics cannot replicate: the daily lived experience of the classroom. Teachers enrich Irish educational research by grounding it in real contexts, culture, and communities. When teachers systematically investigate their practice, they produce local knowledge’ knowledge deeply rooted in their context that informs not only their own classrooms but can contribute to broader understandings of teaching and learning (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1993). While this closeness to practice brings with it a series of ethical challenges, it can also lead to rich insights into learner experiences. 

Practical Ways Teachers Can Stay Research-Active post-graduation 

  1. Join a Teacher Research Group or SIG. Many schools now facilitate inquiry-based groups or professional learning communities. Similarly, professional networks like ESAI, NEARI and T-Rex provide scope for teachers to join special interest groups free of charge. 
  2. Use SSE as a framework for your classroom inquiry. The School Self Evaluation (SSE) framework available in the ‘Looking at our schools’ policy encourages data gathering, reflection, and action as core components of practitioner research. Follow this or a similar framework to simplify your approach to inquiry. 
  3. Engage with the Teaching Council’s research resources. The Teaching Council of Ireland funds research, hosts conferences, and shares practitioner-focused materials via their online library. This is a great resource for teachers who want to access books and readings but don’t have access to a university library.
  4. Present or attend Irish education conferences. Events from organisations like ESAI, SCoTENS, and Féilte festival offer entry points for teacher-researchers to present research. Similarly, STER provides an opportunity for graduates to publish a snapshot of their research post-graduation.
  5. Conduct your own small-scale inquiries. Small projects, one class, one month, one question, can be powerful and manageable. Ask yourself: Why am I doing this? How do I know it works? Who benefits? Who might be excluded?
  6. Collaborate with local universities or education centres Partnerships often welcome practitioner involvement in research projects or classroom trials.

Being a teacher-researcher doesn’t require a PhD, a journal publication, or hours of writing. What it requires is curiosity, a willingness to reflect, and a commitment to understanding your own teaching context. It means seeing your classroom as a place not just of teaching, but of learning (your learning, as well as your students). 

Free resources for teacher-researchers: 

http://www.ster.ie/ – The Student Teacher Educational Research Project. A graduate journal and conference for all educators within 3 years of graduation. 

https://www.t-rex.ie/ – teachers research exchange, connecting teachers, students, and other education professionals. 

https://esai.ie/ – The Educational Studies Association of Ireland. 

http://www.eari.ie/ – The Network for Educational Action Researchers 

References

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/Outside: Teacher Research and Knowledge. Teachers College Press.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). “Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher Learning in Communities.” Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.

Teaching Council. (2016). Code of professional conduct for teachers (2nd ed.). Teaching Council of Ireland. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie

Teaching Council. (2017). Droichead: The integrated professional induction framework. Teaching Council of Ireland. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie

Teaching Council. (2020). Céim: Standards for initial teacher education. Teaching Council of Ireland. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie

Department of Education and Skills. (2016). Looking at our school 2016: A quality framework for post-primary/primary schools. Government of Ireland. https://www.gov.ie

Teaching Council. (2016). Cosán: Framework for teachers’ learning. Teaching Council of Ireland. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie

Guest Biography

Dr Aimie Brennan is Dean of Education: Policy, Practice & Society at Marino Institute of Education in Dublin, Ireland. She is the founder of the Student Teacher Educational Research (STER) project and Vice President of the Educational Studies Association of Ireland. Dr Brennan’s teaching and research explore how to support student teachers and practising teachers in embracing a teacher-researcher identity and engaging in rigorous and ethical research post-graduation. 

Questions and chat

Q1 –  Teacher researcher is different from postgraduate research. What kind of research or inquiry do you most engage with during your practice, if any?

Q2 –  Do you think engaging in research has strengthened your confidence and autonomy as an educator? How so?

Q3 – In your opinion, what are the challenges to staying active as a researcher, post-graduation?

Q4 – What resources have you found most helpful when trying to stay research active in your profession?

Q5 – Finding time and appropriate resources are often cited as the most common challenges facing teachers and educators. How do you balance your engagement in research with your everyday work?

Q6 – Going forward, do you think there are other supports or resources which could be put in place to help you be research active post-graduation? What are they and who do you think should lead this?

Posted in announcement | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

LTHEChat 345: Meeting Students Where They Are – Making Independent Study Work for Every Learner

Join us on Bluesky with guest Nikita-Marie Bridgeman (@nbridgeman.bsky.social) on Wednesday, 26th November 2025 at 20:00 GMT

Independent study is a core element of academic courses and often forms a large part of the hours attributed to a module of study. During this time students are expected to take responsibility for their own learning, determining what, when and how to study (Smith, 2016). While the expectations will differ between disciplines, courses, universities, etc., it is not unusual for a standard delivery module to involve up to 80% independent study time, making it a key contributor to the learning that takes place. However, despite the importance placed on this type of study, there is often a lack of understanding amongst students regarding what this should entail, suggesting that further clarity, guidance, and support is needed to enable learners to engage (Hockings et al., 2018).

The Challenge

The factors that influence how students choose to study in their own time, or whether they can at all, are not clear cut, with barriers such as family and work commitments, time or resource pressures, and accessibility needs impacting the learning opportunities available to students. Similarly, as individuals with ranging abilities, needs, and preferences, the ways in which students may be able to engage with resources will significantly differ from one student to the next; some students love to read and can spend hours with their head in a book, but get bored easily when watching long videos; others may enjoy listening to a podcast while doing another task, but struggle if something needs their undivided attention. Fundamentally, there is no one type of student, so expecting all students to be able to engage with independent study in the same way, regardless of what that looks like, simply does not work.

My Approach

In response to these challenges, I’ve developed an approach to guided independent study that provides learners with a range of resources each week and allows them to choose what to engage with based on their individual preferences. The approach, which I’ve called Something to Watch, Something to Read, Something to Listen to, Something to Complete, is based on a gift-giving phrase I heard on TikTok, and as the name suggests involves providing a resource for each of the named categories (Bridgeman, 2025).

What this can look like in practice:

Something to Watch – YouTube video, excerpt from a documentary, a clip from a TV show or film, news report.

Something to Read – Newspaper or magazine article, blog post, infographic, book pages or chapter, journal article.

Something to Listen to – Podcast episode, radio broadcast, a piece of music.

Something to Complete – Quiz, online learning module, game.

The key to this approach is using resources that align with the kind of content learners typically engage with outside of the classroom and letting them choose which resources to use. By using platforms and resource types that already feature in the day to day lives of students, encouraging engagement becomes much easier, and hopefully even something they look forward to. This approach may also provide a gateway towards engaging with what can often feel like more challenging content whilst also supporting the development of their autonomy as independent learners.

Some Final Thoughts

The ways we can make independent study more inclusive are limitless. The key is to think about the realities of our students and how we can support them to engage despite any barriers they may face. I believe that meeting learners at their level and seeing topics through their eyes is a great place to start, and will help to not only improve the learning that takes place at a module/course level, but will inspire learners to take ownership of their learning and develop their confidence to challenge themselves, be it through sourcing their own materials or trying new learning techniques.

References

Bridgeman, N. (2025, October 9). Take5 #139 Something to watch, something to read, something to listen to, something to complete: An inclusive approach to independent study. Association for Learning Development in Higher Education. https://aldinhe.ac.uk/take5-139-something-to-watch-something-to-read-something-to-listen-to-something-to-complete-an-inclusive-approach-to-independent-study/

Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J., & Jones, R. (2018). Independent learning–what we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145-161.

Smith, C. (2016). Self-directed learning: a toolkit for practitioners in a changing higher education context. Innovations in Practice, 10(1), 15-26.

Guest Biography

Nikita-Marie Bridgeman is a Lecturer at Sheffield Hallam University, leading and teaching on a range of subjects across Sheffield Business School. With a strong focus on student engagement and inclusive learning practices, her research explores innovative pedagogies, co-creation, and strategies that empower learners in diverse contexts. In addition to her role, Nikita serves as an Associate Editor for the Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal (SEHEJ), contributing to scholarship that enhances the student experience.

Questions and chat

Q1 –  If you were tasked with studying independently, what would you do? Provide examples of how you might approach this or what types of resources you might engage with.

Q2 –  How do you currently support students to study outside of the classroom?

Q3 – What are the biggest barriers your students face when engaging with independent study?

Q4 – What role does choice play in student engagement with independent study?

Q5 – How can we balance support and flexibility for students with the workload for educators?

Q6 – If you could give one tip for making independent study inclusive, what would it be?

Posted in announcement | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

LTHEChat 344: AdvanceHE fellowship: what are the benefits for different educator roles and how can we evidence our practice?

Join us on Bluesky with guest Rich Bale (@richbale.bsky.social) on Wednesday, 19th November 2025 at 20:00 GMT

The Professional Standards Framework (PSF) and gaining professional recognition through AdvanceHE fellowship have become ubiquitous across higher education, with colleagues in an increasingly diverse range of roles and contexts gaining recognition. As of the beginning of 2025, AdvanceHE had awarded 200,000 fellowships worldwide, including around 47,000 Associate Fellowships, 128,000 Fellowships, 23,000 Senior Fellowships, and 2,000 Principal Fellowships.

Such recognition has a long history, dating back to the 1990s when professional development programmes were accredited, rather than recognising individuals. The first Professional Standards Framework with descriptors and dimensions for individual practitioners was introduced in 2006, with a revised version published in 2011, and now the current PSF 2023, which was revised after a sector-led review of the framework in 2022. You can read more detail about the development of the PSF in Professor Sally Bradley’s very useful piece on the history and development of the Professional Standards Framework.

Some of the key areas that have been emphasised in the PSF 2023 are:

  • effectiveness and the impact of teaching and supporting learning practices
  • contexts in which teaching and learning support take place
  • inclusivity of educational practices as well as the broader range of colleagues who now engage with the PSF
  • collaboration in various forms, e.g. with students and across different roles and job families

With these changes, colleagues in an increasingly diverse range of roles, including academic and professional services, are now engaging with the PSF and gaining professional recognition. In this session, we’ll think about the benefits that fellowship can bring for colleagues in these various roles, and discuss how to evidence effective practice in the wide variety of contexts in which teaching and learning takes place.

Guest Biography

Dr Richard Bale is an Associate Professor and Director of Academic Development and Research at the University of Law. He is also an Honorary Senior Lecturer in the Centre for Higher Education Research and Scholarship (CHERS) at Imperial College London. He is the co-author, with Mary Seabrook, of the textbook Introduction to University Teaching, which was originally published in 2021 and is now in its second edition, published in September 2025.

Questions and chat

Q1 –  The PSF 2023 highlights the importance of context. What is the context of your role and how does this influence/how has this influenced your approach to achieving fellowship?

Q2 -How has fellowship influenced your practices around teaching & supporting learning? Can you give any examples of how you/colleagues in other educator roles have benefited from engaging with/gaining fellowship?

Q3 – What challenges have you encountered when trying to evidence the effectiveness of your practice for a fellowship application, and how did you overcome them?

Q4 – Collaboration is now a key professional value in the PSF 2023. Who are your main collaborators, and how can you evidence the impact of these collaborations on enhancing practice?

Q5 – How can institutions better support staff in a range of educator roles to apply for and gain fellowship recognition?

Q6 – Looking ahead, what do you think are the next major challenges for those who teach and support learning? How might engagement with fellowship and the PSF help you to navigate and reflect on these challenges?

Posted in announcement | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

LTHE Chat 343: How to teach for sustainability

Join us on Bluesky with guest Mirjam Glessmer (@mirjamglessmer.bsky.social) and Robert Kordts (@robertkordts.bsky.social) on Wednesday, 12th November 2025 at 20:00 GMT

The title of this blog post might sound like we have the answer, but to be clear right away – we do not. But we invite you to address this, the biggest challenge that we as teachers and academic developers are facing, with us, and to hopefully come a little bit closer to answering the question how we can learn – and teach – for a sustainable world.

In this blog post, we suggest different ways to think about teaching for sustainability. We acknowledge that most teachers are not experts on sustainability (which, arguably, do not exist, since sustainability is a wicked problem and solutions need to be co-created locally and globally), that we are all pressed for time, that there are many other tasks and challenges competing for our attention. Given all that, where does one start?

In January 2025, Kyle Bartlett posted on Bluesky about five forms to think about teaching for sustainability in music education. We took this framework and translated it first into Engineering Education, but have since used it in higher education more generally because we find it to be a helpful tool to explore different facets of what is important to consider. In the following, we will thus explore what it might mean to teach about, with, in, through, and for sustainability.

Teaching about sustainability

Teachers starting out on their sustainability journey often begin with teaching *about* sustainability, i.e. teaching about general concepts related to sustainability, for example about the UN Sustainable Development Goals, about climate change, about planetary boundaries. This is not surprising, since most of the resources that are easily available to use or adapt, especially by obvious authorities on the topic like UN bodies and national governments, are designed for the broadest audiences possible, and therefore very general.

While it is important that students have a general understanding of those concepts, the danger is that many teachers are implementing very similar, introductory content so that sustainability, in the students’ perception, might become narrow, repetitive, boring, and disconnected from the course’s or program’s content and therefore not relevant to their studies and their lives. There is also the danger of token discussions when sustainability might be seen as sufficiently addressed after basic concepts have been clarified.

Teaching with sustainability

Another common approach is to teach *with* sustainability: including examples of sustainability applications within the discipline (for example solar panels or carbon neutral bridges in engineering, international negotiations in law, the effect of heat waves on humans in medicine, reimagining monetary systems in economy, and many more). It is very important that students think about sustainability in the context of their subjects! However, examples alone are not enough. If we want to address the bigger picture, it is necessary to connect sustainability and teaching in other ways. We want to challenge teachers to also consider teaching *in*, *through*, and *for* sustainability.

Teaching in sustainability

Teaching *in* sustainability positions the discipline as part of a sustainable world. This means remembering that we are acting as role models for professional and personal responsibility (whether we want to or not), so we should explicitly talk about sustainability as an integrated part of our own and the students’ future professional role. In their article “Do not leave your values at the door”, Nooij et al. (2025) remind us that inaction isn’t neutral, and that what is perceived as activism and permissible depends a lot on whether people agree with the stance, and on whether people are aware that they are not objective themselves.

Teaching in sustainability can also include teaching about how to cope with climate anxiety – sharing our own experiences and emotions, holding space for conversations with students, and pointing to resources. Eriksson et al. (2022) share ways how one might do this.

Teaching through sustainability

Teaching *through* sustainability is about practicing today how we hope to live and work together in a sustainable world. This is not something that we can expect to just magically happen; it needs practicing – both in the sense of repeatedly doing it to get better, and as being in the habit of doing it. Teaching through sustainability means using sustainable pedagogies which are both transformative and emancipatory and facilitate an inclusive and equitable learning environment. A great place to start is to consider that “the magic of inclusion: transformative action for sustainability education” by Ahlberg et al. (2025), or more practically the “Liberating Structures” and Tanner (2013)’s “teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity”.

Teaching for sustainability

Teaching *for* sustainability means inspiring action for sustainable development. It is not enough to have knowledge and understanding, and competencies and skills. We also need to develop our judgement and approach – and foster the will and the drive to use our freedom to do good things in the world. How can we empower students to take action towards a sustainable world?

The literature has generally converged on what competencies students will need to learn to meet those challenges, and Redman & Wiek (2021) suggest a framework which puts the key competencies in sustainability (the four interconnected planning competencies systems-, futures-, values-, and strategies thinking) as well as implementation and integration competence in the context of other professional, disciplinary, and general competencies. While some of these competencies can be practiced independently, their integration – and practicing them in an integrated way – is key (and thus even highlighted as its own competence). How can we ensure our students have the opportunity to learn this?

References

Ahlberg, S., Kennon, P., & Rončević, K. (2025). The Magic of Inclusion: Transformative Action for Sustainability Education. All means all!-OpenTextbook for diversity in education. https://book.all-means-all.education/

Eriksson, E., Peters, A. K., Pargman, D., Hedin, B., Laurell-Thorslund, M., & Sjöö, S. (2022, June). Addressing students’ eco-anxiety when teaching sustainability in higher education. In 2022 International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S) (pp. 88-98). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT4S55073.2022.00020

Nooij, J. M., Collin, N. D. H. & van den Berg, F. (2025). “Do not leave your values at the door; the permissibility of activism in the lecture hall”, Higher Education Research & Development, 44:6, 1512-1527, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2514508

Redman, A., & Wiek, A. (2021, November). Competencies for advancing transformations towards sustainability. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 785163). Frontiers Media SA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.785163

Tanner, K. D. (2013). Structure matters: Twenty-one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 322-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-06-0115

Guests’ Biographies

Mirjam Glessmer is a senior lecturer in academic development at the Centre for Engineering Education, Lund University, Sweden, and an Adjunct Associate Professor at the Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Norway. Her main focus is on supporting teachers in developing their teaching for sustainability and in building trusting relationships between students and teachers. Mirjam likes writing about teaching and learning both on her personal blog mirjamglessmer.com and on a community blog of the Initiative “Teaching for Sustainability” at Lund University.

Robert Kordts is a professor in university pedagogy at the University of Bergen (UiB)
and adjunct professor at the University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS). He is mainly
interested in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), emotions in
university teaching and higher education for sustainability.

Questions and chat

Q1 –  What do you think is the most important knowledge, skill, or attitude our students need to learn to contribute to a sustainable world?

Q2 –  What would you recommend to someone who wants to implement sustainability in their teaching but does not know where to start? What resources, networks, mindsets?

Q3 – If you had a minute, a morning, a month to spend on preparing new teaching for sustainability, where would you put your focus?

Q4 – How do you balance authenticity, professionalism, activism, departmental and student expectations, …?  In your work, in your life?

Q5 – What resources or support would you need to (more) confidently teach for sustainability? Where might you find them, or who might provide them?

Q6 – What action do you want to commit to inspired by today’s #LTHEChat?

Posted in announcement | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

LTHE Chat 342: Digital Leadership for Inclusive and Strategic Change

Join us on Bluesky with guest Alison Purvis (@dralison.bsky.social) and Beth Fielding-Lloyd (@bethflloyd.bsky.social) on Wednesday, 5th November 2025 at 20:00 GMT

Digital leadership in higher education is evolving rapidly. It’s no longer just about managing technology; it’s about shaping culture, taking a human-centred approach, and ensuring inclusive practice. In our work, we’ve explored the perceptions and characteristics of digital leadership in higher education.

Our research highlights that buy-in, role modelling, and advocacy by leaders are significant enablers of digital transformation (McCarthy et al., 2023). Yet leaders are increasingly challenged to take ownership of change while also improving perceptions of value and quality. This calls for a shift in leadership competencies towards human-centred approaches that prioritise empathy, adaptability, and strategic foresight (Lopez-Figueroa et al., 2025).

Despite growing interest, less is known about the perspectives of digital leaders themselves. What does it mean to lead digital change in a university setting? How do leaders navigate uncertainty, embrace innovation, and model their own digital development – even when they are not technical experts?

In participatory workshops, we asked leaders from across academic, administrative, and student domains for their perspectives on digital leadership (Mercer-Mapstone et al., 2017). We recognised that digital leadership is distributed. It is not confined to formal hierarchies or job titles. It is enacted across the university community into teaching, professional services, research, student support, and many other roles.

From our research, we have the following recommendations for effective digital leadership:

  1. Prioritise CPD for staff currency and agility in digital practices
  2. Make digital literacy and development a leadership expectation (not digital expertise)
  3. Value expertise without needing to be the expert
  4. Build confidence through robust training, support, and time to talk about digital in teaching and learning
  5. Develop strategic understanding of technology
  6. Centre the student experience in digital strategy
  7. Embrace change, vulnerability, and lead with vision and compassion

If you are interested in bringing our digital leadership workshop to your team or institution, please let us know!

References

Lopez-Fugueroa, J.C., Ochoa-Jimenez, S., Palafox-Soto, M.O. & Sujey Hernandez Munoz, D. (2025). Digital leadership: A systematic literature review. Administrative Sciences, 15, 4, 129 

McCarthy, A. M., Maor, D., McConney, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), https://doi.org/100479. 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education. International Journal for Students as Partners1(1). DOI:  https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119

Guests’ Biographies

Alison Purvis is Associate Dean and a sector leader in digital education and open access publishing. She was named in the AI 100 UK List in 2025 for her contributions to ethical and transparent AI use in higher education. Alison was also a finalist for the ALT Awards for Leadership in Digital Education, recognising her strategic work with Jisc, the Office for Students, and Sheffield Hallam University. Her research and leadership span digital transformation, inclusive pedagogy, and third space roles, with a strong focus on compassionate and critically informed practice.

Beth Fielding-Lloyd is the Deputy Dean for Quality and Apprenticeships at University College Birmingham. She has a track record in the delivery of transformational projects and specialises in enhancing the student experience through the advancement of digital capabilities, inclusive pedagogies, and assessment for learning strategies. Beth’s current research focuses on students’ perceptions and articulation of digital competencies, exploring how these insights inform curriculum design and pedagogical development.

Questions and chat

Q1 –  What is digital leadership in education? Is it different to other contexts of leadership?

Q2 –  Do you recognise your own role as a digital leader in education? What does it look or feel like?

Q3 – How can digital leaders support equity and inclusion?. What are the challenges and opportunities?

Q4 – What tools, frameworks, or connections have helped you develop your digital leadership?

Q5 – How does culture shape digital leadership, and how do you influence that culture in your role?

Q6 – If you could change one thing about how digital leadership is understood or enacted in education, what would it be?

Posted in announcement | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment