#LTHEchat 213: Belonging – does it matter in the student experience? Led by Jenny Crow @JennnCrow

Photo by Caio from Pexels

Within the UK, the next weeks bring the start of a new academic year, which can bring up a mixture of thoughts and feelings for both staff and students. The start of a new year can also be a time to reflect or potentially introduce new things. Araújo et al (2014) talks about “academic, social and cultural adjustments” students undertake when starting at University. The start of the 2021/22 academic year also brings additional challenges. Many students will be adjusting and re-adjusting due to a wide range of learning experiences impacted by the pandemic.

Rovai (2004) found that low sense of belonging could lead to students dropping out especially in a blended and online context, this could be relevant to this year, as many students will be in this situation of taking some learning on-campus and some online. In 2019, 5 institutions launched the Developing Sense of Belonging in online distance learning toolkit, although the toolkit was aimed at online distance learning the principles can be translated to other students. One of the first things the toolkit asks viewers to do is try and consider what their students are feeling and what it is like from their perspective. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs framework (1943) was initially posed as a theory of motivation. Later in 2013, a meme was then shared on the BBC website that included Maslow’s framework plus an added addition. Whether the addition in this case is in the correct place could be up for debate.

Image source BBC, 2013

The author of the meme might not have discovered Milhein (2012) which had already applied Maslow’s framework to an online learning context and had included internet access in the first level (Physiological). The author later shared the importance of staff involvement in creating an environment of belonging and acceptance through communication, collaborative activities and feedback. However, without the initial levels of Physiological and Safety being met first then belonging was more challenging, consequently Wi-Fi is important to belonging!

Finally, not all students are the same and therefore experience different levels of belonging. Booker (2016) shares the importance of considering that some students can feel a lack of belonging that could be linked to ethnicity and gender. Singh (2020) gives some practical tips, such as creating a culture with lack of judgement, sharing of videos and explaining of local language terms – all of which can assist students from different backgrounds to feel like they belong.

In this week’s #LTHE tweet chat we are going to explore what belonging means and how it is put into practice in a learning context.

References

Araújo , N. et al., 2014. Belonging in the first year: A creative discipline cohort case study. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(2), pp. 21-31.

Booker, K., 2016. Connection and Commitment: How Sense of Belonging and Classroom Community Influence Degree Persistence for African American Undergraduate Women. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(2), pp. 219-229.

Maslow, A. H., 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review.

Milheim, K. L., 2012. Towards a Better Experience: Examining Student Needs in the Online Classroom through Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Model. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(2), p. 159.

Rovai, A. P. & Jordan, H., 2004. Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2).

Singh, G., 2020. Supporting black, asian minority ethnic (BAME) students during the COVID-19 crisis. Shades of Noir.

This Week’s Host: Jenny Crow

Jenny Crow (@jennncrow) is the Digital Education Team Manager in the College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences at the University of Glasgow. Her role involves leading a small team in the College of MVLS, who build content for fully online MSc programmes as well as providing digital education support for staff and students involved in these programmes. Additionally, Jenny is undertaking a part-time PhD at the University of Glasgow. Her topic is analysing sense of belonging for online distance students and whether technology can impact sense of belonging. Her research projects include virtual tours, virtual graduations, virtual worlds and virtual students (robots). Jenny has over a decade of experience in digital education / learning technology and is a proud CMALT holder. Jenny is passionate about creating an excellent student experience and introducing strategies so to encourage all students to be part of the University. Jenny enjoys outdoor sports, travelling and drinking nice coffee.

Jenny Crow - dressed in white and blue, with right hand raised. Standing againts a blue, purple and pink background.
Jenny Crow

Posted in announcement | Leave a comment

#LTHEchat 212 Adapting to the New Normal: Hybrid, Hyflex &Dual Mode teaching and Learning. Led by Danielle Hinton @hintondm & Rachelle O’Brien @rachelleeobrien

Image captured from Thingllink showing a lecture theatre and students joining remotely

All of us teaching and supporting learning have experienced 18 months like no other. We’ve experienced an emergency online pivot followed by many of us being required to deliver fully online, whether that was real time – synchronous, flexible – asynchronous or a combination of both. It’s been such a steep learning curve for the whole community, in all our various roles (student, teacher, researcher, educational / academic development, digital, careers, library, English Language support and more). Coming to the start of the new academic year in the UK, many of us potentially need to design and deliver small and large(r) group real-time, synchronous face-to-face and online sessions.

There are three main labels that are used in the literature and the wider educational community to define and make sense of this new world – Hyflex, Hybrid and Dual Mode. You and your institution may use these (perhaps with slightly different meanings) or a variety of other terms. We’ve distilled their main characteristics as follows:

  • Attendance Options: “students [have] the option of attending sessions in the classroom, participating online, or doing both. Students can change their mode of attendance weekly or by topic, according to need or preference.” – a Northern Illinois University definition who use the term Hyflex. The University of Hong Kong uses the term Dual Mode. 
  • Attendance Both Online and In-Person: “Students have some learning online and also attend in-person synchronous classes. Online learning may be synchronous or asynchronous. (Online may be called remote learning or extended campus(” – Sue Beckingham defines this as Hybrid.
  • Attendance Defined by the University – Need and Location: There may be two distinct portions of a student cohort. Students that are on-campus will attend in-person unless there is a need to join online (isolating due to Covid, other illness, accessibility). Students off- campus for any reason (especially those based overseas or in the workplace) will access the same session remotely online. Some Universities define this as Hybrid.

Stephen Brookfield in his book “Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher” proposes four lenses to help support critical reflection around teaching and supporting learning: (1) autobiographical, (2) students’ eyes, (3) colleagues’ experiences, and (4) scholarly literature (2017) . It’s important that we turn to these as many of us now enter this new phase of simultaneous teaching in-person and online.

Autobiographical Lens

We’ve all had experiences, recent and in the past as learners. What helped engage you as a learner? What are the values, beliefs, knowledge (including tacit) and skills that we are bringing with us? What signature pedagogies (techniques and activities) are important to us and our discipline and how can we continue them (Shulman, 2005)? For us – active, authentic and social learning and assessment is vitally important. What about you?

Student Lens
Let’s not forget to look at this educational challenge through the lens of the student. Our learners 

  • have had nearly two years of interrupted schooling and / or life transitioning into and through to HE / FE at whatever level
  • they don’t know what their learning environment will look like (how do I…). 
  • they’d like to know that they are important and known, especially where they may become one of hundreds
  • they need support transitioning into disciplines (or parts thereof) with its own language, way of reading, listening, thinking and writing. 
  • are going to be on an emotional rollercoaster ride as they navigate all of the above and the next phase of the pandemic
  • especially international, mature and differently abled and may need more tailored support.

Colleague and Scholarly Literature Lenses

Let’s not forget that some US, Australian and Hong Kong institutions and UK innovators have been at this for a while. We have many pandemic experiences both individually and institutionally to draw on. Finally we have  a rich body of scholarly knowledge, research and practice built up over the last 20 years around online and distance learning that will help us towards success in the coming year. Raes et al (2020) writes:

“It is stated that this type of learning environment requires radical shifts in the teachers’ pedagogical methods in order to accommodate to the new technology (Cain 2015; Ramsey, Evans and Levy 2016). More specific, Weitze (2015) provided an adequate description of the influence technology has:

“Although technologies are physical tools and not theoretical thinking tools or concepts, they change not only the way we carry out a task, but also the way we think about the task” (McLuhan 1964; Hasse and Storgaard Brok 2015 as found in Weitze 2015, p. 1). The synchronous hybrid learning environment requires a new kind of setup that highly influence the pedagogic and learning design (Weitze, Ørngreen and Levinsen 2013), and thus demands other methods of teaching and different activating learning activities (Bower et al. 2015). This means that the teacher or trainer has to adapt his/her teaching approach, but simultaneously has to maintain comparable learning standards (Grant and Cheon 2007; Lightner and Lighnter-Laws 2016)”. 

So, how can we draw on the wisdom of the community and the lessons in the literature and practice around online, blended and distance learning to help those that teach and support learning to survive and thrive in this new normal? 

Join us on Wednesday 15th September on

  • Twitter (8pm BST and thereafter) for our traditional #LTHEchat.
  • Padlet (all day) for an #LTHEchatFringe discussion. Designed to cater for those that don’t have Twitter accounts or who can only participate in normal work hours. Go to https://padlet.com/hefi1/e6t48ua86n0ivy66 

References and Further Reading

Hybrid / HyFlex and Dual Mode references and resources 

General References

  • Brookfield, S.D., (2017) Becoming a critically reflective teacher. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Gurung, R.A., Chick, N.L. and Haynie, A., (2009) Exploring signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind. Stylus Publishing, LLC..
  • Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I. and Depaepe, F., (2020) A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), pp.269-290. https://t.co/wUI5nf1Jbd?amp=1 
  • Shulman, L.S., (2005) Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), pp.52-59. https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/0011526054622015 

Chat Hosts

Danielle Hinton – Educational Developer, Higher Education Futures institute (HEFi), University of Birmingham) @hintondm

I provide support for the enhancement of teaching and learning practice, promote innovation in the curriculum, and facilitate the career-long professional development of Birmingham academics and professional staff in regards to teaching and supporting learning. I am particularly interested in active learning (including enquiry and problem based learning), the emotions of learning and teaching, enhancement of learning through technologies, distance learning and serious play in Higher Education. I am a Senior Fellow of the HEA and am currently working on the design and delivery of a fully online PGCHE programme.

Rachelle O’Brien – Senior Digital Learning Designer in the Durham Centre for Academic Development (DCAD) @rachelleeobrien

As a Senior Digital Learning Designer in DCAD, myself and my colleagues (Candace and Mark) provide specialist pedagogic advice and work with academics to design engaging and inclusive learning. Operating at the level of the programme or whole department we work to ensure an active, blended and consistent learner experience across modules and programmes. We also provide development opportunities around the design of innovative learning activities within a module, programme or at an activity level. 
I have worked in education for over 10 years, and have particular interests in digital education, play and games. Recently this interest has led me to develop and deliver multiple Escape Rooms for use in education across the sector both nationally and internationally. I am a recent graduate of the MSc in Digital Education from University of Edinburgh, a Certified member of the Association for Learning Technologists and is a Senior Fellow of the HEA.

Midlands Academic Practice network @MidAcPracUK
The Midland Academic Practice (MAP) Network is a peer run practice enhancement group with members from Higher Education institutions right across the Midlands (UK) region from Northampton to Lincoln. Members usually have an academic development remit in their role. Meetings run 2-3 times per year either online or in person and include a CPD development opportunity offered by the ‘host’ organisation.  There are also some ad-hoc events in between and chance to build relationships and contacts with other members.

#LTHEchat Questions

Question 1. What does synchronous teaching of in-person and online students look like for you and your institution?
– What terminology, pedagogies and technology are or will be used?
– Will you be supported?
– What size cohort or groups and sessions are you expecting?

Question 2. Learners who are making the transition into and through Higher / Further Education have faced two wildly disrupted years. How might we support these learners generally and in this new & different way of learning?

Question 3. Designing for active learning. How can we can adapt our teaching approaches & maintain comparable learning standards, especially in large #DualMode #HyFlex #Hybrid classes. What approaches, techniques and activities have worked, or not worked for you?

Question 4. Thinking about Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (#EDI). How can we support student belonging, being seen, heard and included and associated emotions of learning in synchronous (in-person and online) teaching and supporting learning?

Question 5. What strategies and guidance should we consider when planning for the first synchronous (in-person and online session) teaching and supporting learning session? Be sure to mention your particular context.

Question 6. We’re all in this together. #DualMode #HyFlex #Hybrid might feel completely new, or you may have a lot of experience with it. Please make a recommendation or key consideration to bare in mind over the next year (pedagogical, technical or administrative wise).

Posted in announcement | Leave a comment

#LTHEchat 211: Student Engagement led by Dr Chris Headleand @ChrisHeadleand

Image of students feet looking down at the message 'Passion led us here'.
Photo by Ian Schneider @goian on Unsplash.

Dr Chris Headleand @ChrisHeadleand is an Associate Professor and National Teaching Fellow with over 20 years’ experience in a variety of teaching and learning roles. I am currently the director of Teaching and Learning at the School of Computer Science at the University of Lincoln. My research interests include Virtual Reality, Student Engagement, Serious Games, and Learning Communities.

Chris Headleand

The focus of this weeks #LTHEchat is Student Engagement. This is a term that we use extensively in Higher Education, but often in a range of different contexts.  We use the term to describe everything from “being engaged” (i.e. paying attention) in lectures to tangible inclusion of student’s voices in institutional decision making, to simply “turning up” or “logging on”. The range of available definitions can make discussion and debate challenging.

I explain my philosophy in this THE article:

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/what-does-student-engagement-mean-you-and-you-and-you

Expressly, I caution against describing the act of “being engaged” as “student engagement”, and I use a cooking analogy to explore the difference.

“If we make a dish, an “engaged diner” would be focused on the meal and the dining experience. As chefs, we have prepared something they enjoy, and they are motivated to eat it. By comparison, “diner engagement” would be inviting the diner to join you in the kitchen, asking them to help you plan the meal, maybe getting their tasting notes as you prepare the dish and perhaps even giving them access to the spatula.”

Headleand 2021 / Times Higher Education

Defining these qualities differently is essential as they are inherently different qualities and activities. If we want to understand the student experience better, we should explore its various facets. As a rule, I prefer the following definitions, as they separate out different ways people define “engagement”.

Student Commitment: A holistic measure of a  student’s personal engagement in their learning environment. 

Student Motivation: A student’s enthusiasm and interest directed towards specific topics or learning activities.

Student Participation: The process by which students are encouraged to actively take part in a learning activity.

Student Engagement: The practice of involving students in education beyond the typical threshold requirements of their programme of study.

I am also concerned about how we measure the concept of being engaged. Often in the pedagogic literature, engagement is measured rather bluntly using attendance as the metric. Does this actually help us measure how engaged someone is? If I went to the cinema to watch a film and fell asleep during the intro, would I have “engaged” with that? But if not engagement, then how should we tangibly measure engagement?

www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/we-shouldnt-confuse-online-engagement-logging

But if not attendance, then what measure should we use?

In this LTHETweetChat we will discuss the academic realm of student engagement. Specifically how we define it, what benefits it brings, and how we should measure it.

6 Questions

Q1 Lets start with a fun one. What is the most engaged you have ever felt? Either as a student or professional. What made that experience feel “engaging”, or why was being “engaged” important to your experience?

Q2 Student engagement is a term used ubiquitously. How would you normally define student engagement if you were explaining it to someone new to education? What other definitions have you heard?

Q3 Using this definition (Student Motivation)

“A student’s enthusiasm and interest directed towards specific topics or learning activities.”

How do you encourage motivation in your students? How do you develop enthusiasm in learners?

Q4 Using this definition (Student Participation)

“The process by which students are encouraged to actively take part in a learning activity.”

How do you create an environment where students want to actively participate? What are your key strategies?

Q5 Using this definition (Student Engagement):

“The practice of involving students in education beyond the typical threshold requirements of their programme of study. “

How do you facilitate, support and develop *Student Engagement* in your institution?

Q6 Pick one of the previous definitions (Student Motivation, Student Participation, or Student Engagement) how can we measure or quantify these in an educational setting? How should (or could) these be monitored?

Link to the Wakelet: https://wke.lt/w/s/kAK70K

Posted in announcement | Tagged | Leave a comment

Prize day for the #LTHEchat #AdvanceHE_chat community – everyone’s a winner

Win Prizes Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash

From Wimbledon to the Euros, from graduations to the Sewing Bee, the start of summer heralds the celebration of some wonderful examples of human endurance, creativity, athleticism and imagination.  Whilst we recognise and applaud these inspirational examples of individual and collaborative efforts, we thought it was also time to reflect on and celebrate all of our small wins over the last year.  From surviving whole days of online meetings to remembering it was #tweetchat day – let’s pat ourselves on the back and celebrate everyone’s successes: our colleagues, our students and our own.

“Everybody has won, and all must have prizes”

Bring your gifs, emoji, bitmoji to congratulate your colleagues on all their wins – big and small, before we float down the lazy river into summer with a nice slow-paced tweetchat to end this academic year.

Posted in announcement | Leave a comment

#LTHEchat 210: Re-Thinking Responsibility: The role of Higher Education

“The Principles for Responsible Management Education have the capacity to take the case for universal values and business into classrooms on every continent.”

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon

This week’s hosts

@DrClaireMay @drsustainable @DrJLouw2

This week we welcome an #LTHEchat takeover by three members of the Principles for Responsible Management Education UK and Ireland Regional Chapter @PRME_UKI who share a common interest in promoting responsible management education.

Dr Claire May @DrClaireMay is the Co-Chair of the PRME Chapter UK and Ireland 2021 conference “Crises and the Re-Thinking of Responsibility” hosted by the University of Lincoln 5-7th July 2021.  She is an Associate Professor in marketing, specialising in sustainability and is the College lead for PRME.

Ardley, B. and May, C. (2020). Ethical marketer and sustainability: Facing the challenges of overconsumption and the market, Strategic Change 29(6):617-624

Dr Alex Hope @drsustainable is a past Vice-Chair of the PRME Chapter UK and Ireland, and current Co-Chair of the PRME Working Group on Climate and Environment. He is Deputy Pro Vice-Chancellor for the Faculty of Business and Law, Northumbria University where he is responsible for teaching and learning.

Molthan-Hill, P., Hope, A., & Welton, R. (2020). Tackling Climate Change through Management Education. The SAGE Handbook of Responsible Management Learning and Education, 165.

Hope, A., Croney, P., & Myers, J. (2020). Experiential Learning for Responsible Management Education. The SAGE Handbook of Responsible Management Learning and Education, 265.

Dr Jonathan Louw @DrJLouw2 is Chair of the PRME Chapter UK and Ireland and also organises the popular annual PRME Responsible Business and Management Writing Competition. In his day job he is a Principal Lecturer (Learning and Teaching) at Oxford Brookes Business School.

Louw J, (2015). ‘”“Paradigm Change” or No Real Change at all? A Critical Reading of the UN Principles for Responsible Management Education.”‘ Journal of Management Education 39 (2) pp.184-208

Introduction

#LTHEchat 210 is hosted by Claire, Alex and Jonathan on behalf of the UK and Ireland Regional Chapter of PRME and asks us to consider “Re-Thinking Responsibility: The role of Higher Education”

The United Nations Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) were developed in 2007 to provide a global point of reference for all those committed to the nurturing of ethical, responsible and sustainable mindsets in university students and graduates. Some 900 signatories form a worldwide movement supported by a global Secretariat in New York. While the home of PRME is in business schools worldwide, many of its members pursue these commitments into other faculties, programmes and curricula.

Regional PRME Chapters, such as the UK and Ireland Chapter, help to advance the Six Principles (see below) within a particular geographic context, rooting PRME in different national, regional, cultural, and linguistic landscapes. They function as platforms for localized engagement from higher education institutions, and in cooperation with Global Compact Local Networks, develop projects and initiatives that support the Sustainable Development Goals regionally.

PRME recently held its annual Global Forum, an online sharing of insights and good practices drawing in over 2000 educators from all continents. Ahead of PRME’s UK and Ireland Annual conference on 6 and 7 July, this week’s #LTHEchat seeks to draw into conversation all those engaged in education and research linked to help frame a set of debates that will be pursued at our conference, to be hosted online by the University of Lincoln.

This year’s conference theme, ‘Crises & the Re-thinking of Responsibility’, is an acknowledgement of PRME’s ongoing role in the shaping of debates and practices and in inspiring universities to continuously re-think their purpose and practice. The declarations of a ‘Climate Emergency’, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the racial inequalities highlighted in 2020-2021 give rise to opportunities for reflection on the consequences of business as usual, the role and response of universities and the construction of the future. We aim to facilitate questioning and critique, reflecting on the purpose of education as well as practical applications of this in terms of advancing our pedagogy and creating effective research and collaborative partnerships. 

The questions we shall address in #LTHEchat 210 are linked to our three conference themes.

Theme 1: Advancing pedagogy; challenges and opportunities

Under this theme we particularly recognise that as responsible educators critically engaging with the UN SDGs we may need to move beyond the boundaries of our subject.

Theme 2: Partnerships with purpose; breaking boundaries

This theme recognises the importance of effective partnerships within the university sector and with organisations, social movements etc. outside the sector in order to realise the UN SDGs.

Theme 3: Creating a vision of socially and environmentally responsible education

Here we hope to draw out some of the more challenging questions regarding rethinking and purpose in this time of crisis.  What does it mean to educate responsibly in the context of social and environmental challenges such as: the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, loss of biodiversity, plastic pollution; decolonisation of the curriculum; continuing racial and other inequalities; and the accelerated use of artificial intelligence (AI)?

More information

If you would like to attend our Lincoln conference on 6 and 7 July, you can find more information here: http://prmeuki2021.org.uk/ The deadline for registration is 2nd July.

Useful Resources

The 6 PRINCIPLES

Principle 1 Purpose: We will develop the capabilities of students to be future generators of sustainable value for business and society at large and to work for an inclusive and sustainable global economy.

Principle 2 Values: We will incorporate into our academic activities, curricula, and organisational practices the values of global social responsibility as portrayed in international initiatives such as the United Nations Global Compact.

Principle 3 Method: We will create educational frameworks, materials, processes and environments that enable effective learning experiences for responsible leadership.

Principle 4 Research: We will engage in conceptual and empirical research that advances our understanding about the role, dynamics, and impact of corporations in the creation of sustainable social, environmental and economic value.

Principle 5 Partnership: We will interact with managers of business corporations to extend our knowledge of their challenges in meeting social and environmental responsibilities and to explore jointly effective approaches to meeting these challenges.

Principle 6 Dialogue: We will facilitate and support dialog and debate among educators, students, business, government, consumers, media, civil society organisations and other interested groups and stakeholders on critical issues related to global social responsibility and sustainability.

International Journal of Management Education – Special Issue on PRME (2020)

PRME UK and Ireland Website

PRME Global Website

The UN Sustainable Development Goals

6 Questions:

Q1 In the context of sustainability, what does responsible education mean to you? #LTHEchat

Q2 Can you share examples of working beyond your academic discipline to promote engagement with ethics, responsibility and sustainability? #LTHEchat

Q3 In the context of the SDGs what are the competencies & mindsets a university needs to be a good local, regional, national and international partner? #LTHEchat

Q4 What is a purposeful partnership or SDG project that has given you the greatest pride or had the most impact? #LTHEchat

Q5 If HE is to accelerate its contribution to shaping a more just and sustainable world, what is stopping us? What should we not be afraid to do? #LTHEchat

Q6 What is the purpose of a business school within the context of these challenges? #LTHEchat

Wakelet

You can revisit this TweetChat #LTHEchat 210 via its Wakelet https://wke.lt/w/s/DEMtcn

Posted in announcement | Tagged , | Leave a comment

#LTHEchat 209: Implementing the Science of Learning in Higher Education

Photo by Sergey Katyshkin on Pexels.com

This week’s Host

Dr Carolina Kuepper-Tetzel is a Lecturer in Psychology at the University of Glasgow. She is an expert in applying findings from Cognitive Psychology to education and an enthusiastic science communicator. She obtained her Ph.D. in Cognitive Psychology from the University of Mannheim and pursued postdoc positions at York University in Toronto and the Center for Integrative Research in Cognition, Learning, and Education (CIRCLE) at Washington University in St. Louis. Before joining the University of Glasgow, she was a Lecturer in Psychology at the University of Dundee. Her expertise focuses on learning and memory phenomena that allow implementation to educational settings to offer teachers and students a wide range of strategies that promote long-term retention. Carolina is convinced that psychological research should serve the public and, to that end, engages heavily in scholarly outreach and science communication. She is a member of the Learning Scientists and founded the Teaching Innovation & Learning Enhancement (TILE) network. The TILE Network brings different disciplines and sectors together to discuss how to overcome prevailing issues in education with research-based approaches. Carolina is frequently invited to give CPD workshops and keynotes on learning and teaching worldwide. Carolina was awarded Senior Fellow of HEA. She is passionate about teaching and aims at providing her students with the best learning experience possible. In her free time, Carolina enjoys going on family trips to explore the beauty of Scotland, listening to her vinyl records, reading books, or watching movies and series. You can follow her work via Twitter: @pimpmymemory.. 

Introduction

This week welcomes the Learning Science Tweetchat community (#LrnSciChat) to the Learning & Teaching Higher Education Tweetchat community (@LTHEchat) for an exploration of Implementing the Science of Learning in Higher Education. This mash up will provide fertile ground for fruitful discussion and we hope to support the productive mingling of these two exciting communities. Please explore the Learning Science Site (Teaching Innovation & Learning) in preparation for a lively evening. (note: the questions will be hosted under the #LTHEchat site).

Questions

Q1 – What is the Science of Learning and why may it be important for Higher Education? Provide examples of the science of learning.

Q2 – One promising learning strategy is ‘spaced practice’. What is it and how can it be implemented in the classroom?

Q3 – Another effective learning strategy is ‘retrieval practice’. What is it and how can it be implemented in the classroom?

Q4 – How would you evaluate the effectiveness of your implementation of a new teaching activity in your classroom?

Q5 – What are potential hurdles when implementing the Science of Learning in Higher Education?

Q6 – Share/discuss resources that support the implementation of the Science of Learning in Higher Education?

Wakelet

You can revisit this TweetChat, harvested using #LTHEchat, via its Wakelet. https://wke.lt/w/s/6Q-v5i

Posted in announcement | Leave a comment

#LTHEchat 208: An #LTHEchat with students

Photo by Helena Lopes on Pexels.com

Young and Lee (2020) suggest that higher education understands student voice as a ‘feedback loop’ that universities are constantly racing to close.  Institutions are peppered with student voice initiatives, Mendes and Hammett (2020) suggest that student voice is both ubiquitous and orthodox in HE, but how many of them actually create meaningful dialogue and change?

Bourne and Winstone (2020) discuss the importance of ‘surfacing’ student voice in an authentic way.  Whilst large scale, formalised surveys might be a sector wide expectation it is vital that as practitioners we find a way to value and legitimise authentic student voice. Why don’t we start by reconsidering the word “voice”? Dialogue seems to sit much more naturally and suggests a conversation rather than a monologue.  

When strong and productive relationships are built with students, dialogue becomes concomitant.  Ahmadi (2020) refers to students as “hidden treasures,” drawing on the work of Bovil et al (2016) to consider them as co-creators, designers and agents for change.  

Join us for an LTHEchat with a difference.  A group of Edge Hill University students will join the discussion to share the student perspective in real time. 

Questions

  1.  What does student voice look like in your institution?
  2.  How do you engage students as partners? What has worked well and what hasn’t?
  3. How does student feedback impact the ‘power dynamic?’
  4. The sector faces increasing commercialisation and marketisation.  How do we help students to be scholars rather than consumers?
  5. How do we embrace the ‘loop’ and communicate thinking and actions in response to student feedback?
  6. What would the perfect feedback system look like to you? Be as creative as you can with your answer. 

This week’s Host: Sarah Wright

Sarah Wright

Sarah Wright is a Faculty Senior SOLSTICE Fellowship Lead. Her role has seen her develop projects on the use of social media and online teaching, as well as lecture engagement and seminar design.  Sarah is an Apple Distinguished Educator, has written for the Times Educational Supplement,  contributing on a range of educational issues and sat on the Board of Management for NAACE, the national association for educational technology. Last year, she co-chaired the National Conference for Social Media in Higher Education and is now proud to sit on the editorial board for the journal.  Sarah is a Fellow of the Chartered College of Teaching where she also enjoys reviewing for ‘Impact’ journal.  Sarah was shortlisted for the Guardian Excellence in Teaching award in 2019 and the Educate North award in the same category.  She was proud to win the Student Led Staff Award for Outstanding Contribution to Teaching.

Wakelet

You can revisit this TweetChat via its Wakelet

Posted in announcement | Leave a comment

#LTHEchat 207: Using Social Media in Teaching and Learning

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

This week’s Host: Dr Mohamed Saeudy

Dr Mohamed Saeudy (@DrSaeudy) is a senior Lecturer in Accounting and Finance and Director of Research Centre for Contemporary Accounting, Finance and Economics (Res CAFE). His research area is sustainable accounting and finance. He helps design many postgraduate courses to develop accounting and finance tools to manage the contemporary challenges of sustainable development such as big data, data analytics, climate change, modern slavery, UN SDGs, human rights and ecological biodiversity. He develops social media tools e.g. blogs to explore how organisations could make business opportunities and profit from considering social and environmental activities. He also developed innovative academic courses on DBA, Green Accounting, Sustainable Finance and Financial Entrepreneurship. These courses covered many contemporary topics ranging from corporate governance to sustainable business strategies and policies. In addition, Dr Saeudy provides professional consultancies for many business organisations in the UK and overseas in the field of sustainable business solutions, entrepreneurial finance, green finance, risk management and virtual business innovation.

Introduction

This session aims to consider how social media could be used to support academic practices during and beyond the Covid-19 conditions. It aims to explore some practical approaches to using Social Media in a satisfying and sustainable way. I am looking forward to exploring future opportunities for using social media beyond the Covid-19 conditions to support the student experience.  

Image by Dr Mohamed Saeudy

The power of using social media during and beyond the Covid-19 pandemic

One of the most contemporary topics in the HE sector is to understand the implications of the Covid-19 pandemic for people’s everyday lives. This pandemic created new normal realities for the decision-making of educators, students, customers, managers, shareholders, lenders, suppliers, and employees. A growing range of issues have a bearing on this new world, including human wellbeing, remote learning, value for education, online teaching and increased expectations on HE institutions with regard to student satisfaction, staff wellbeing, and creating effective online communications. In order to address these challenges, many universities are increasingly turning to offer short courses and online blended learning degrees. Often these degrees intend to help academics and students to get more involved with many social media platforms to build up effective online capabilities and conduct their institutional communications. 

Challenges and opportunities

In response to the growing recognition that universities must respond to the Covid-19 conditions, a number of social media platforms have been used over the last year to guide and manage student learning at a different level. These include using social media platforms in teaching and learning and supporting student engagement. There are several benefits that could be achieved from using social media in teaching and learning such as exploring the leading edge and contemporary topics and enhancing digital pedagogy. However, there are also some challenges from the risks and toxic side of using social media. Furthermore, the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) presented another valid level of challenges that should be considered to control social media communications.

Recommended links:

A quick guide to managing organisational social media accounts
https://markcarrigan.net/2018/05/01/a-quick-guide-to-managing-institutional-social-media-accounts/

Call for Participants – Digital Inequality in Education: Pasts, Presents and Futures

How has the pandemic changed internet use in the UK?

See also:

Balakrishnan, V., 2016. Key determinants for intention to use social media for learning in higher education institutions. Universal Access in the Information Society, Volume 16, pp. 289-301.

Crawford, J. et al., 2020. COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 3(1).

Manca, S., 2020. Snapping, pinning, liking, or texting: Investigating social media in higher education beyond Facebook. Internet and Higher Education, , Volume 44.

Niu, L., 2019. Using Facebook for academic purposes: Current literature and directions for future research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(8), pp. 1384-1406.

Purvis, A. J., Rodger, H. M. & Beckingham, S., 2020. Experiences and perspectives of social media in learning and teaching in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, Volume 1.

LTHEchat 207 Questions

  1. What are the main social media platforms that could be used in teaching and learning in HE? And how do you use them?
  2. What benefits can academics find in using social media in teaching and learning?
  3. What are the main roles of using social media in supporting Education for Sustainable Development?
  4. How can you integrate social media into your curriculum design and planning?
  5. What are the main limitations and challenges of using social media in teaching and learning?
  6. How could social media help us to further build up online capabilities and competencies during the Covid-19 pandemic?

Wakelet

You can revisit this TweetChat via its Wakelet

Posted in announcement | Leave a comment

#LTHEchat 206: Are we really going to decolonise the curriculum? If so, how and when?

Photo by Clem Onojeghuo on Unsplash

This week’s host

Frederica Brooksworth @fbrooksworth founder of Fashion Scholar is an International Fashion Educator and Strategist and  author of the forthcoming book Fashion Marketing in Emerging Economies due to be published by Palgrave Macmillan in Summer 2021.

With over a decade of experience lecturing at over 30 institutions including the London College of Fashion, Conde Nast College of Fashion and Design and Hult International Business School, Frederica has experience developing educational content and strategies for the Business of Fashion, FashMash and Style House Files.

Frederica holds a BA in Fashion Marketing, MA in Fashion Entrepreneurship and Innovation and Postgraduate Certificate in Teaching and Learning. She is currently pursuing a Doctorate in Education with a focus on EdTech, Knowledge and Skills Gap in addition to Innovating the African Fashion Education system.

#LTHEchat 206 asks Are we really going to decolonise the curriculum? If so, how and when?

With a proliferation of literature on decolonising the curriculum in Higher Education, it is a fundamental topic that must be addressed. Many universities have created ad-hoc initiatives equipping teaching staff with the tools and resources to implement change within their classrooms. However, it is clear to see that to date in the fashion education system it has not been effective as the topic of decolonising the curriculum is rarely covered. The fashion curriculum has a strong focus on European Fashion and does not reflect the Global Fashion Industry. As a result, this conversation aims to get a better viewpoint on the challenges, advantages and potential recommendations. 

Introduction:

This topic is very important to me as a Black Woman who was once a fashion student and now teaches fashion, and sees how in a decade there have been no changes to the curriculum. Black culture has a huge influence on the fashion industry from clothing, to accessories, hair, lingo you name it; yet, we fail to include these references within the curriculum. Black fashion should not only be taught through a trip to a museum in the world costumes department, it should be embedded in the curriculum and taught in our institutions.

It is of paramount importance to draw attention to the verity that fashion education plays a pivotal role in the structure of the fashion landscape and is often perceived as the pathway into the industry. The fashion curriculum requires modification given that fashion has changed rapidly over the years and is continuously evolving due to the advancement of technology, macroeconomic trends and cultural influences, yet our institutions have failed to keep at the same velocity. At present, the fashion curriculum focuses predominantly on European fashion history and designers. This notion of European fashion as the mecca of the industry has infiltrated into the minds of generations. The fashion media itself is still not as diverse, with rarely any press coverage on Black fashion talent and it is these publications that are used in our classrooms to create mood boards, to write case studies and to learn about the contemporary fashion industry.

A great proportion of learning resources e.g. books, journal articles, trade publications are mainly written by European scholars. This poses a significant concern as this may influence one’s mind subconsciously believing that Black academics are not credible, intellectual or qualified to educate on the topic of fashion. According to a report by The Independent Black students are 50 % more likely to drop out of university than their Asian and White counterparts; expressing that contributing factors retaining Black students include a lack of connection to culture in the curriculum, making friends with students and academics due to beliefs, traditions and backgrounds. We must draw attention to the matter that not only is there a diversity issue as it attains to the curriculum, this also the case for academic staff. The Guardian reported that Black academics make up only 2% of those working within UK universities.

See also

Bulman, M., 2021. Black students 50% more likely to drop out of university, new figures reveal. [online] The Independent. 2017.

The Guardian. 2021. Fewer than 1% of UK university professors are black, figures show

Additional links to learn more about decolonising the curriculum

Decolonising the Arts Curriculum

Research Collective for Decoloniality & Fashion

Wakelet

You can revisit this TweetChat via its Wakelet

#LTHEchat 206: Questions

Q1 – What does decolonising the curriculum mean to you?

Q2 – What core steps do you think institutions need to take to decolonise the curriculum?

Q3 – Who do you think is responsible for decolonising the curriculum within institutions?

Q4 – What are the challenges of decolonising the curriculum?

Q5 – How would you assess the impact of decolonising the curriculum?

Q6 – What opportunities do you think decolonising the curriculum brings to HE?

Posted in announcement | Leave a comment

#LTHEchat 205: Spotlight on Educational Development

This week’s Host

Dr Jonny Johnston (@JonnyJohnston) is based in Academic Practice at Trinity College Dublin, where he works closely with academics and programme teams across Trinity to support excellence in teaching and learning. Jonny is a module coordinator for Trinity’s Special Purpose Certificate in Academic Practice and his current research and teaching interests sit in assessment, curriculum development, and teaching enhancement. His favourite boardgames include Ticket to Ride and Scrabble, and he is an absolutely appalling chess player. 

In a nutshell

Educational development (#EdDev)work, also called faculty development (#FacDev) or academic development (#AcDev), is often carried out at institutional boundaries (Gibbs, 2013). Boundaries between home and work physical and virtual campus infrastructure have become extremely porous for many of us in the last year.

Have the faultlines and border zones between different ‘regions’ of educational development activity been similarly affected by our mass crossing into virtual space?  

#LTHEchat 205 asks you to articulate what educational development means to you: what does #EdDev work ‘look’ like,  where does this work take place, and (why) does it matter? Colleagues with all sorts of roles related to teaching and learning are encouraged to join in this week’s chat and share ideas, practices, and (of course) share recommendations for biscuits for sustenance during marking season! 

Introduction

There was a cracking session on ‘treasure island’ pedagogies (see the Wakelet for #LTHEChat #203 ) a couple of weeks ago that really got me thinking about terminology in a way I haven’t for a while – particularly in relation to rich metaphors like islands of disciplinary practice, sending messages in bottles, and thinking back to how we’ve all had to find new ways to navigate the stormy seas of professional practice under Covid-19 and chart a course to the end of the academic year.

Of course, I’m using all this nautical terminology to invoke images of adventure, space, and exploration as we try and map out a pathway back to our lives amid all the disruption. These are terms are purposefully not neutral – maps and mapping metaphors always bring up questions of power, agency, and ownership of space. I crossed into educational development by way of postcolonial literary and cultural studies and I’m always intrigued by how words can be used to emphasise or elide power dynamics within everyday terminology.

This week’s questions use ‘educational development’ as the most neutral term I could find to encourage as open a dialogue as possible during the #LTHEChat. I’m not keen on the titles of academic or faculty developer (exclusionary – what about graduate teaching assistants, other staff, or my own professional development that happens through dialogue with others); learning developers are more likely to be student-facing than staff-facing (with their own areas of expertise); and academic colleagues involved in Communities of Practice & pan-institutional learning communities (Cherrington, Macaskill, Salmon, Boniface, Shep, & Flutey, 2018) can have enormous educational development impact on peers and students alongside their formal remit as educators. 

#LTHEChat205 looks back at what educational development has meant to you over the last year and asks: what next? 

See also:

Cherrington, S., Macaskill, A., Salmon, R., Boniface, S., Shep, S., Flutey, J. 2018. Developing a pan-university professional learning community. International Journal for Academic Development 23, 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1399271

Hamilton, B. & Graniero, P.A. (2012) Disruptive cartography in academic development, International Journal for Academic Development, 17:3, 243-258. DOI: 10.1080/1360144X.2012.700894

Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development 18:1, 4 – 14. 

Wakelet

You can revisit this TweetChat via its Wakelet
https://wke.lt/w/s/vV50ql

#LTHEchat 205: Questions

Q1 – What does educational development (#EdDev / #AcDec / #FacDev) mean or look like to you?

Q2 –  Think back a bit: how would you describe your relationship with educational development in February 2020? (e.g. pre-pandemic!)

Q3 – Do you think perceptions of educational development work have changed in your context since then? Why/why not?

Q4 – Who ‘does’ #EdDev in your own institution/context and where do they ‘sit’ on the institutional map?

Q5 – How might you identify, prove, or evidence the impact of educational development activity  

Q6 – What do you see as the biggest opportunities/challenges for your own development for the next academic year?

Posted in announcement | Leave a comment