Thank you everybody for voting for #LTHEchat
-
This work by #LTHEchat is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. #LTHEchat every Wednesday 8-9pm GMT
visitors
Follow @lthe on Twitter
My TweetsMarch 2021 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Tags
- #altc
- academic development
- Alison James
- animation
- Anna Wood
- Anne Nortcliffe
- assessment
- Chris Corker
- Christmas
- co-creators
- collaboration
- Covid19
- curriculum design
- data
- David Eddy
- David Hopkins
- David Smith
- Digital fluency
- Dr jenny Fisher
- Dr Magda Bober
- Dr Rachel Forsyth
- e-Learning
- employability
- Engaging Imagination
- failure
- feedback
- flipped classroom
- Frances Bell
- game-based learning
- Hala Mansour
- Haleh Moravej
- Helen Beetham
- Higher Education
- informal learning
- interdisciplinary working
- internationalisation
- Kay Hack
- Kirsten Jack
- learning
- learning spaces
- Liz Bennett
- LTHEchat
- Luigina Ciolfi
- Mark Jepson
- mobile learning
- Nicola Whitton
- online learning
- open badges
- organising team
- pedagogic research
- Peter Lumsden
- Phil Vincent
- poll
- Prof. Sally Brown
- Prof. Simon Lancaster
- Progression
- research-informed teaching
- Roisin Cassidy
- Ruth Lawton
- Scholarship of Learning and Teaching
- Simon Lancaster
- Simon Rae
- social media
- SoTL
- Steven Peters
- student
- student engagement
- student voice
- summer
- teaching
- TEF
- TEL
- unengaged learners
- virtual learning spaces
Tag Archives: academic development
#LTHEchat 172: (How) Does assessment motivate students? with guest hosts Beverley Gibbs and Gary Wood
(How) Does assessment motivate students? The concept of intrinsic motivation covers a number of ideas including students recognising that they are instrumental in their own success, believing in their own ability to succeed, and developing the deep personal interest that … Continue reading
Posted in announcement, SoTL
Tagged academic development, Scholarship of Learning and Teaching, SoTL
Leave a comment
Q6: What are the best online spaces (digital libraries, museums, archives, online organizations, etc.) where you and your students can continue their learning beyond the classroom?
Supporting colleagues in contingency planning for Coronavirus: Covid19: A Special Edition #LTHEchat (Chat 170) Question 6 with Laura Gibbs What are the best online spaces (digital libraries, museums, archives, online organizations, etc.) where you and your students can continue their learning … Continue reading
Posted in announcement
Tagged academic development, distance learning, edtech, online learning, teaching
Leave a comment
#LTHEchat 165: Transitions into Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) with Linnea Soler @DrLinneaSoler and Nathalie Sheridan @drnsheridan
Transitions into Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) What is the purpose of this week’s SoTL chat? Linnea and I are not focussing on the definitions and debates around the terminology of SoTL. We want to explore how engaging in … Continue reading
Posted in announcement, SoTL
Tagged academic development, Scholarship of Learning and Teaching, SoTL
1 Comment
#LTHEchat 163: The Role of Curriculum Frameworks in Higher Education with Adam Longcroft @AdamL50 and Iain Cross @iain_d_cross
The last decade has seen rapid and dramatic changes in the higher education landscape in the UK. The lifting of the ‘cap’ on student numbers led to increased competition between higher education institutions (HEIs) and the influence of new market forces, whilst the introduction of the OfS has seen the replacement of a relatively benign funding body, with a new sector regulator.
In this LTHE Chat session the aim is to encourage colleagues across the sector to reflect on the current position of their own institutions in relation to Curriculum Frameworks (i.e. has a perceived need for one been identified? Is a debate underway? Is a framework in place? Is it being implemented?), and to consider the potential benefits that an institutional level Curriculum Framework might bring?
Furthermore, we’d like colleagues to consider what a Curriculum Frameworks focus on? Structural reform or consistency, regulatory consistency, innovative approaches to learning and teaching, student co-creation, or inclusivity? Or a combination of all of these things? What are the obstacles and constraints encountered elsewhere or likely to inhibit such developments and how can these be overcome?
Who should be the key stakeholders, collaborators and/or champions? How can buy-in be secured, not just from senior managers, but also from academic and professional services staff, and students? What are the legitimate objectives of a Curriculum Framework, and how might we measure its impact?
What may have seemed like stability has been replaced by a culture of what sometimes feels like an avalanche of rapid and fundamental changes, some of which impinge on the financial sustainability of institutions and some of which have driven major cultural changes – not least a rapid shift in student expectations of the higher education experience, and the relationship between institutions and their students. The relative strengths and performance of HEIs is now more transparent than ever, and reflected (however crudely) via published university league tables, NSS results and TEF rankings. Continue reading